PSI - Issue 2_A
S Choudhury et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 736–743 S. Choudhury, S. K. Acharyya, S. Dhar / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000
742
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 0,000000
100 150 200 250 300 350 400
y = 94.61x + 6.429
2 )
2 )
J M‐pl (N/mm
G fr (N/mm
Gfr versus Temp
Temp=‐80C
0 50
‐100
‐50
0
50
0,250000
0,500000
Temperature (°C)
Crack Growth (mm)
Fig 11. J M-pl versus Crack growth at -80°C
Fig 12. G fr versus Temperature at varying temperatures
Table 2. Comparison of estimated G fr from two different approaches for different a/w ratio
Table 3. Estimated G fr values at varying temperatures
G fr
G fr from the slope J m-pl -Δa curve
G fr from the slope J m-pl - Δ a curve
Sl. No
Sl. No.
Temperature
a 0
a/W
For 1mm crack growth
For 2mm crack growth
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
22
336.1 307.2 310.0 323.0 295.9 209.8 54.61
1 2 3 4 5 6
22.68 22.82 25.99 24.52 27.50 27.88
0.45 0.46 0.51 0.49 0.55 0.56
308.13
306.98 331.67 306.40 330.40 277.85 244.93
277.2 379.6 382.1 336.9 273.6 232.0
0
-20 -40 -60 -70 -80
333.8
311.22 333.63 283.65 265.62
5. Conclusion
i. G fr values have been estimated for the material 20MnMoNi55 steel for different crack lengths using both graphical approach and from the slope of J m-pl method (Table 1 and Table2). It is observed using both the approaches the G fr values are very close to each other and almost constant for different a/w ratios for the material 20MnMoNi55 steel. The deviation in the estimation of G fr for varying geometries is ±17% using J m-pl method whereas for graphical approach the deviation is around ±9%. ii. The G fr values estimated from the slope of J m-pl –Δa curve for low temperature is somewhat expected as we can see from Table 3. With the decrease in temperature there has been a considerable amount of decrease in the values of G fr. Since the contribution of ductile stretch is almost negligible at -80°C so the G fr has dropped down very steeply as shown in Fig 11. As the crack growth is very low at-80°C so the G fr has been estimated from the slope of J m-pl –Δa curve at a low regime of crack growth. iii. In the lower temperature regime multiple tests and evaluation of G fr is required to characterise it. iv. A combined model consisting G fr to capture the contribution of temperature dependent ductile stretch and energy for brittle fracture can be useful to characterise fracture toughness in DBTT.
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease