PSI - Issue 55

50 Tahmineh Akbarinejad et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 55 (2024) 46–56 T Akbarinejad,* , E. Machlein, C. Bertolin, O.Ogutc, G. Lobaccaro, A. T.Salaj / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

5

3. Results and discussions As a first step of the methodology, the Table 1 compiles the review of 34 articles focused on the challenges and barriers to the integration of solar technology in historical buildings. Challenges are represented by white dots, and barriers are symbolized by black dots in Table 1.

Table 1 References to challenges and barriers retrieved in literature.

Challenges

Barriers

References

Social

Reliability & Safety

Viability

Technical

Economic

Feasibility

Integration

Legislation

Reversibility

Conservation

Acceptability

Geographical

Compatibility

Non-invasiveness

1 (Kandt et al., 2011a) 2 (Guttormsen & Fageraas, 2011) 3 (Røstvik, 2013) 4 (Moschella et al., 2013) 5 (C. S. P. López & Frontini, 2014) 6 (Imenes, 2016) 7 (Borda & Bowen, 2017) 8 (Tzetzi, 2019) 9 (Sesana et al., 2019)

10 (Thebault et al., 2020) 11 (Sudimac et al., 2020) 12 (Pelle et al., 2020) 13 (Rosa, 2020) 14 (Lucchi et al., 2020) 15 (P. López, 2020)

16 (Jackson Inderberg et al., 2020) 17 (Roosmalen & Gritzki, 2020)

18 (Gholami et al., 2020) 19 (Durante et al., 2021) 20 (De Medici, 2021)

21 (Polo López, Lucchi, et al., 2021) 22 (Polo López, Troia, et al., 2021) 23 (Ibrahim et al., 2021) 24 (Xue et al., 2021) 25 (Roszczynska-Kurasinska et al., 2021) 26 (Sánchez-Pantoja et al., 2021) 27 (Tsoumanis et al., 2021) 28 (Shuldan & Al-Akhmmadi, 2021) 29 (Kalliopi et al., 2022) 30 (Lucchi et al., 2022) 31 (Lucchi et al., 2022) 32 (Cumo et al., 2022) 33 (Badawy et al., 2022) 34 (Mete Basar Baypinar, et al)

20

1

1

2

5

5

1

5

3

10

3

15

9

27

Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker