PSI - Issue 11

J.I. Gisbert et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 11 (2018) 428–435

435

8

Author name

/ Structural Integ

rity Procedia 00

(2018) 000–000

F

urthermore, ounding the Y the numerica n figure 12 c erical model

in the model axis where l model samp an be observe and the labor

results can b the load is ap le fails due to d the compar atory experim

e noticed how plied, being shear stress ation between ent.

the higher e these joints th before the pla the loading

lastic strains e path where sticity behav process and t

concentrate i the sample u ior is reached he displaceme

n the mortar sually fails. I . nt produced

joints n this of the

surr case I num

Figure 9

: Base loads and

top vertical disp

lacements.

5. C T num inte easi Dru one T rein resu to a Ref [1] H [2] K 2 [3] A C [4] A 2 [5] E p [6] A C [7] E r [8] G C [9] S S [10]

ONCLUSIO he model cre erical model rpolation betw er than other lso, modern cker-Prager R s. he possibility forcement ma lts which can pply to mason erences . Bilgin and O. K . Chaimoon and 056–2068, 2007 . Gabor, E. Ferri onstr. Build. Ma . H. Akhaveissy 00–214, 2012. N 1052-1, “Meth . 11. STM E519/E51 onshohocken, P . Bernat-Maso, einforced mortar . Alfano, M.A. omputational Iss . Ivorra, D. Bru, ec. Eng, vol. 7 (2 ANSYS Mechan

NS ated with hig s in order t een nodes, w older element elements all ankine criter to use these sonry metho lead to deve ry heritage an orini, “A new m M. M. Attard, . er, E. Jacquelin, ter., vol. 20, no. , “The DSC Mod 9M. 2010. “Stan A., 2010. L. Gil, and P. R and subjected to Crisfield, Finit ues, Int. J. Nume A. Galvañ, S. Si 017) pp 463-474 ical, release 18.2 ods of test for m

h order elem o simulate m hich improve s. ow using rec ion, which ca criteria and ds, such as T lop formulatio d modern bu

ents using A asonry and s the capabili ent failures n be used to p complexity to RM, and dev ns, which ma ildings restor

NSYS softwa predict its fa ty to develop criteria inclu erform nume perform num elop parametr y allow prof ation and repa

re proves to ilure. These more comple ded in ANSY rical models w erical model ic FEM analy essionals to st ration.

be a valid te elements pe x models and S recent ver ith more pos s can be an o sis in order t udy the neces

chnique to de rmit the qua reach conver sions, such sibilities than pportunity to o obtain num sary reinforc

velop dratic gence as the older study erical ement

A

odeling approac “Modeling of un and P. Hamelin, 5, pp. 308–321, 2 el for the Nonlin

h in the pushover reinforced mason “Analysis and m 006. ear Analysis of I

analysis of maso ry walls under

nry structures.” shear and compr

ession,” Eng. Str

uct., vol. 29, no

. 9, pp.

odelling of the in

-plane shear beh

aviour of hollow

brick masonry p

anels,”

n-plane Loaded

Masonry Structu

res,” Open Civ. E

ng. J., vol. 6, no

. 1, pp.

asonry - Part 1: D

etermination of

compressive stre

ngth,” in Europe

an Committee fo

r standardization

, 1999,

dard Test Meth

od for Diagonal

Tension (Shear)

In Masonry As

semblages.” AST

M Internationa

l, West

oca, “Numerica eccentric compr e Element Interf r. Methods Eng. lvestri, C. Apera

l analysis of the essive loading,” E ace Models for 50 (2001) 1701– , D. Foti, “TRM

load-bearing ca ng. Struct., vol. the Delaminatio 1736. reinforcement of

pacity of brick m 91, pp. 96–111, n Anaylsis of L

asonry walls st 2015. aminated Comp

rengthened with

textile

osites: Mechanic

al and

masonry specim

ens for seismic a

reas” Int. J. of S

af. and

, help system, 4.

9 Geomechanics,

ANSYS, Inc.