Issue 78
A. Zakharov et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 78 (2026) 260-274; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.78,16
where ε denotes the strain, σ the stress, σ 0 the yield stress, E the elastic modulus, n the strain hardening exponent and α the Ramberg-Osgood model hardening coefficient. When the nonlinearity is introduced through this constitutive equation for a strain-hardening material, the singular solution developed by Hutchinson [1,2] takes the following form: 1 1 , n ij P ij r K r (2)
1
, r
P K r
(3)
n
1
e
e
1 , n P n n P ij P ij r K r
(4)
1
,
K r u 1 n n P
u r
i
,
1,2
(5)
i
i
1 2
3 2
(6)
e
s s
1
ij ij
,max
max
, ij r is the dimensionless angular stress function,
here r and are polar coordinates with origin at the crack tip,
P K is
e is the equivalent (von Mises) stress normalized by yield stress σ 0 , and r is the crack tip distance
the plastic SIF,
normalized by crack length r r a . The corresponding strain components are expressed as:
3 4
n
1
rr
rr
e
rr
3 4
(7)
n
1
rr
e
rr
3 2
1
n
1
r
r
e
r
Small scale yielding As shown by Shih [6], the plastic SIF in pure Mode I (or pure Mode II) can be related directly to the elastic SIF via the J integral [5]. For the general case of mixed mode biaxial loading, the components of the J - integral in the local Cartesian coordinates system are expressed through the elastic SIF K 1 and K 2 as follows: 2 2 1 2 1 1 4 x J K K E (8) 1 2 2 1 1 4 y J K K E (9) where E is the Young’s modulus, ν is the Poisson’s ratio, k = 3-4 ν . For an infinite-size CCP subjected to biaxial loading, the plastic SIF is related to the J-integral by Shih’s relation in SSY regime, which is represented as [6]:
0 2
n
2
2 y
1
J J
(10)
J
I K
x
n P
E
262
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter creator