PSI - Issue 83

Victor Rizov et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 83 (2026) 95–104

102

0.950 3  l m,

/9    ,

1.5  f ,

1.5   and

0.300  a m,

1.7  n ,

90  r ,

1.8   ,

1.4   .

Fig. 2. SERR versus angle,  , at /

15

(graph 1), /

30

(graph 2) and /

45

3  l h

3  l h

3  l h

(graph 3).

Fig. 3. SERR versus parameter,  , at /

0.5 2 3  l l (graph 1), /

1.0 2 3  l l (graph 2) and /

2.0

2 3  l l

(graph 3).

The SERR is plotted versus the angle,  , in Fig. 2 in order to examine how the SERR behaves when  is changed. The relation between the SERR and  is examined at three l h / 3 ratios (Fig. 2). This is done to see what