PSI - Issue 68

Hande Vural et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 68 (2025) 573–580 Vural et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 00 (2024) 000–000

580

8

References

Ayada, M., 1987. Central bursting in extrusion of inhomogeneous materials, in: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Technology for Plasticity, Stuttgart, 1987, pp. 553–558. Bai, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2010. Application of extended mohr-coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. International Journal of Fracture 161, 1–20. Brozzo, P., Deluca, B., Rendina, R., 1972. A new method for the prediction of formability limits in metal sheets, in: Proc. 7th biennal Conf. IDDR. Cockcroft, M., 1968. Ductility and workability of metals. J. of Metals. 96, 2444. Deng, Y., Zhang, W., Cao, Z., 2012. Experimental investigation on the ballistic resistance of monolithic and multi-layered plates against hemispherical-nosed projectiles impact. Materials & Design 41, 266–281. Deng, Y., Zhang, W., Cao, Z., 2013. Experimental investigation on the ballistic resistance of monolithic and multi-layered plates against ogival nosed rigid projectiles impact. Materials & Design 44, 228–239. Dey, S., Børvik, T., Teng, X., Wierzbicki, T., Hopperstad, O., 2007. On the ballistic resistance of double-layered steel plates: an experimental and numerical investigation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 44, 6701–6723. Erdogan, C., Vural, H., Karakas¸, A., Fenerciog˘lu, T.O., Yalc¸inkaya, T., 2023. Ductile failure of inconel 718 during flow forming process and its numerical investigation. Engineering Failure Analysis 152, 107424. Flores-Johnson, E., Saleh, M., Edwards, L., 2011. Ballistic performance of multi-layered metallic plates impacted by a 7.62-mm APM2 projectile. International Journal of Impact Engineering 38, 1022–1032. Freudenthal, F.A., 1950. The inelastic behavior of solids. Wiley . Go¨c¸men, Y., Erdogan, C., Yalc¸inkaya, T., 2023. A numerical ballistic performance investigation of Armox 500T steel through ductile damage models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 292, 109658. Go¨c¸men, Y., Erdogan, C., Yalc¸inkaya, T., 2023. A Numerical Study on the Ballistic Performance of Projectiles Formed by Shaped Charge. Journal of Applied Mechanics 90, 111011. Go¨c¸men, Y., Vural, H., Erdog˘an, C., Yalc¸inkaya, T., 2022. Numerical analysis of ballistic impact through FE and SPH methods. Procedia Structural Integrity 42, 1736–1743. 23 European Conference on Fracture. Holmen, J.K., Johnsen, J., Hopperstad, O.S., Børvik, T., 2016. Influence of fragmentation on the capacity of aluminum alloy plates subjected to ballistic impact. European Journal of Mechanics, A / Solids 55, 221–233. Iqbal, M.A., Gupta, P., Deore, V., Tak, S., Tiwari, G., Gupta, N., 2012. E ff ect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit. International Journal of Impact Engineering 42, 11–24. Iqbal, M.A., Senthil, K., Sharma, P., Gupta, N., 2016. An investigation of the constitutive behavior of Armox 500T steel and armor piercing incendiary projectile material. International Journal of Impact Engineering 96, 146–164. Johnson, G.R., Cook, W.H., 1985. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 21, 31–48. Ko, Y.K., Lee, J.S., Huh, H., Kim, H., Park, S., 2007. Prediction of fracture in hub-hole expanding process using a new ductile fracture criterion. Journal of Mterials Processing Technology 187, 358–362. Le Roy, G., Embury, J., Edwards, G., Ashby, M., 1981. A model of ductile fracture based on the nucleation and growth of voids. Acta Metallurgica 29, 1509–1522. Ma, H., Xu, W., Jin, B.C., Shan, D., Nutt, S.R., 2015. Damage evaluation in tube spinnability test with ductile fracture criteria. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 100, 99–111. McClintock, F.A., 1968. A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes. Journal of Applied Mechanics 35, 363–371. Oh, S.I., Chen, C.C., Kobayashi, S., 1979. Ductile Fracture in Axisymmetric Extrusion and Drawing—Part 2: Workability in Extrusion and Drawing. Journal of Engineering for Industry 101, 36–44. Palta, E., Gutowski, M., Fang, H., 2018. A numerical study of steel and hybrid armor plates under ballistic impacts. International Journal of Solids and Structures 136, 279–294. Paman, A., Sukumar, G., Ramakrishna, B., Madhu, V., 2020. An optimization scheme for a multilayer armour module against 7.62 mm armour piercing projectile. International Journal of Protective Structures 11, 185–208. Poplawski, A., Kesdzierski, P., Morka, A., 2020. Identification of Armox 500T steel failure properties in the modeling of perforation problems. Materials & Design 190, 108536. Rezasefat, M., Mostofi, T.M., Ozbakkaloglu, T., 2019. Repeated localized impulsive loading on monolithic and multi-layered metallic plates. Thin-Walled Structures 144, 106332. Rice, J., Tracey, D., 1969. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 17, 201–217. Senthil, K., Iqbal, M.A., 2021. Prediction of superior target layer configuration of armour steel, mild steel and aluminium 7075-T651 alloy against 7.62 AP projectile, in: Structures, Elsevier. pp. 2106–2119. Teng, X., Dey, S., Børvik, T., Wierzbicki, T., 2007. Protection performance of double-layered metal shields against projectile impact. Journal of mechanics of materials and structures 2, 1309–1329. Vural, H., Erdog˘an, C., Fenerciog˘lu, T.O., Yalc¸inkaya, T., 2022. Ductile failure prediction during the flow forming process. Procedia Structural Integrity 35, 25–33. Vural, H., Erdogan, C., Karakas¸, A., Fenerciog˘lu, T.O., Yalc¸inkaya, T., 2023. Experimental identification of uncoupled ductile damage models and application in flow forming of IN718. Materials Research Proceedings 28, 807–816. Xiao, X., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Jia, B., 2022. E ff ect of incorporating lode angle parameter into a fracture criterion in predicting ballistic impact behavior of double-layered 2024-T351 aluminum alloy plates against blunt projectiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering 160, 104082.