Issue 62
V. Shlyannikov et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 62 (2022) 1-13; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.62.01
E LASTIC GENERALIZED PARAMETER GPK1
T
he values of the elastic SIF K 1 were obtained in accordance with standard ASTM E399 [12] by the following equations. For the compact tension C(T) configuration:
q P
a
K
1 Y B W W
1
2
3
4
a W
2
a W
a
a
a
a
0.886 4.64
(4)
Y
13.31
14.72
5.6
1
1.5
W W
W W
a W
1 /
and for the single-edge-notched bend (SENB) configuration:
1 3 2 1 q P L a Y BW W
K
1
2
3
4
a W
a
a
a
a
(5)
Y
1.93 3.07
14.53
25.11
25.8
1
W W
W W
where a is the crack length, B is the specimen thickness, W is the specimen width, L 1 is the span of the bending specimen, and Y 1 is the geometry-dependent SIF correction factor. The values of the P Q loads were obtained using the typical load versus load-line crack opening displacement curves for the C(T) and SENB configurations.
HRR- PLASTIC GENERALIZED PARAMETER GP K P
T
he classical HRR singular solution [13,14] for an infinite size cracked body of a strain-hardening material was completed by Shlyannikov and Tumanov as numerical method [15] for plastic stress intensity factor determination applied to mixed mode plane strain/plane stress problems and general three-dimensional (3D) structural element configurations. According to this method, the plastic SIF K p can be expressed directly in terms of the corresponding elastic SIF K 1 : 1 1 2 2 1 n K a
yn I
W
0
K
(6)
P
n
where α and n are the strain hardening parameters, yn is the nominal stress, 0 is the yield stress, and I n is the governing parameter of the elastic–plastic stress–strain fields in the form of dimensionless factor:
n a w d
FEM
FEM
( , ,
n I
n a w
, ,
FEM
FEM
du
du
n
1 n e
FEM
FEM
FEM FEM
FEM FEM
r
rr
r
n a w
u
u
, ,
cos
sin
r
n
d
d
1
(7)
1
FEM FEM FEM FEM rr r r u u
cos
n
1
4
Made with FlippingBook PDF to HTML5