Issue 53
Z. Li et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 446-456; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.35
p
p
p
F
F
F
P
( , , ) σ D
=
+
+
=
σ
D
F
:
:
0
(33)
p
p
σ
D
p
D
D
F
F
D
=
=
( , ) Y D
: Y + D
(34)
F
:
0
Y
D
By drawing the constitutive equations, the plastic hardening law, and damage criterion (33)~(34), into one system, the plastic and damage multiplier can be determined [37-39]:
3 4 R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R − − − − 2 6 1 5 2 6
1 6
=
p
3 5
(35)
D =
2 4
3 5
where
s s
s s
2
p F
p
p
2
: = Y D , F Y
Y
Y
F
ij ij
ij ij
e
= −
=
=
= −
σ
R
:
:
,
,
,
,
R
:
R
R
R
:
4
1
3
2
5
e
D
D
σ
Y
Y
2 6 J
6
J
D
p
D
p
D
2
D
2
: Y
Y
F
=
: −
.
R
6
Y D D
D
Y
D
D
N UMERICAL SIMULATIONS
F
=
v =
or limestone, the below parameters are obtained in triaxial compression tests: 0 E
88.198
GPa
0.255
, 0
,
0.13 = ,
=
=
=
m =
=
1.5 k = ,
m =
n =
B = −
r
0.004
m
1800
0.00012
0.00014
133
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
11.5
7.5
0.25
2
0
1
5
3 Pa. The dilute scheme, which is used for an elastic solid that has been weakened by an isotropic distribution of non-interacting closed microcracks[40-42], yields the following theoretical initial values of damage variable: 11 0.02 D = , 22 0.02 D = . 1.33 = , 0 4.9795 10 Y =
160
(σ 1 -σ 2 )/MPa
140
120
100
80
60
40
Present model
Experimental data ε 1 x10 -6
20
-6
ε
2 x10
0
-2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Figure 2: Simulation of stress-strain curve under triaxial compressive test with confining pressure 10MPa
453
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software