Issue 53
Z. Li et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 446-456; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.35
( ,
Q
) p
p ε
=
(25)
p
(
)
(
)
0, =
=
σ D
σ D
F
, ,
0,
F
, ,
0
(26)
p
p
p p
The change rate of the mean plastic strain p
p e is defined by:
m and deviatoric plastic strain
p m p =
(27)
s
p
=
e
p
2
J
2
( , ) p p D is concluded by a standard derivative of the thermodynamic
From Eqn. (3), the plastic hardening function
potential [35]:
(
p ,D,
)
(
)
m
0 p
m
0
=
(1 = −
− +
−
D)
D)
(28)
( ,
tr
2
B
p p
p
p
p p
p
( , p A ) D indicates the plastic hardening modulus, which is expressed as follows:
The scalar valued function
p
p
F
Q F
Q
p
)
( ,
=
−
D
D) :
A
: ( E
:
(29)
p
p
σ
σ ε
σ
p
0 D = , the plastic multiplier is resolved from the plastic consistency condition:
If
p
F
: E(D) ε
:
σ
=
(30)
p
P
F
Q
: ,D)+ E(D) σ
A
(
:
p
σ
The rate form of constitutive equations can be expressed as follows:
: ep = σ E ε
(31)
ep E is the fourth order tangent elastoplastic tensor given by:
where
p
Q
F
E(D)
E(D)
:
:
σ
σ
ep
( , ) A E D E(D) = −
(32)
p
F
Q
( A
: ,D)+ E(D) σ
:
p
σ
Coupled elastoplastic damage behavior Under general loading conditions, plastic flow and damage evolution occur in a coupled process. Both the plastic strain and damage evolution rates should be determined concurrently, by applying the plastic and damage consistency conditions in a coupled system [36].
452
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software