Crack Paths 2006
Proceedings of Crack Paths 2006, Parma, Italy
International Conference on
C R A CPKA T H S(CP 2006)
Parma(Italy), 14th-16th September, 2006
University of Parma, Via Università, 12
ISBN:978-88-95940-27-4
SomeExperiences with CrackPath Issues
L. P. Pook1
1 University College London
ABSTRACT.As is well known many engineering structures and components contain
cracks or crack-likeflaws. It is widely recognised that crack growth must be considered
both in design and in the analysis of failures. The complete solution of a crack growth
problem includes determination of the crack path. Macroscopic aspects of crack paths
have been of industrial interest for a very long time. At the present state of the art the
factors controlling the path taken by a crack are not completely understood. The
purpose of this introductory paper is to set the scene for the more detailed papers which
follow. Eight brief case studies are presented. These are taken from the author’s professional and personal experienc of macroscopic crack paths over the past 50
years. They have been chosen to illustrate some of the more important aspects of crack
paths. Many more examples are included in the invited and contributed papers
presented during the Conference.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
As is well-known, manyengineering structures and components contain cracks or flaws
and, therefore, crack growth must be considered both in design and in the analysis of
failures. The complete solution of a crack growth problem includes the determination of
the path taken by the crack. The path taken by a crack in a critical component or
structure can determine whether failure is catastrophic or not. Knowledge of potential
crack paths is also needed for the selection of appropriate non-destructive testing
procedures. Muchcurrent work is concerned with crack growth viewed on macroscopic
scale. However, crack tip features associated with the growth of a crack, maybe viewed
at different scales [1], as shown for metals in Table 1. All these scales are of interest in
the consideration of crack paths. The International Conference on Fatigue Crack Paths,
held in Parma in 2003 [2, 3], was devoted to consideration of fatigue crack paths at
various scales.
From a theoretical viewpoint the complete solution of a crack growth problem
includes determination of the crack path. It is often assumed that the crack path is
known, either from theoretical considerations, or from the results of laboratory tests.
However, at the present state of the art, the factors controlling the path taken by a crack
are not completely understood [4] and, in practice, macroscopic crack paths in
structures are often determined by large scale structural tests [5, 6].
In order to set the scene for various crack path issues discussed in the detailed
papers which follow some brief case studies are presented. These are taken from the
author’s professional and personal experience of macroscopic crack paths over the past
50 years.
Table 1. Fracture process scales
Scale (mm) Feature
Ions, electron cloud
10-6
10-5
Dislocations
Subgrain boundary precipitates
10-4
Subgrain slip band
10-3
Grains, inclusions, voids
10-2
Large plastic strains
10-1
Elastic-plastic field
1
Stress intensity factor
10
100
Componentor specimen
Figure 1. Cracks in undercarriage bay
Figure 2. Surface of crack in an
undercarriage bay bracket.
bracket.
A I R C R A FUTN D E R C A R R IBAAGYEB R A C K E T
The relationship between modeof fatigue loading and paths taken by fatigue cracks has
been of interest for a long time [7, 8]. This information can be useful in failure analysis
and Figure 1 shows an example from 1961. It is a bracket from an aircraft undercarriage
bay which showed unexpected cracking at rivet holes. The bracket was a formed 18 swg
(1.2 m mthick) aluminium alloy angle, 10 u 0.8 u 0.8 in (254 u 20.3 u 20.3 mm). The
figure shows a general view of typical cracks observed after the bracket was removed
from the bay. Examination of the fracture surfaces of the cracks showed that fatigue
cracks had originated at both surfaces of the bracket at the rivet hole corners and then
propagated inwards on elliptical crack fronts, with the two cracks intersecting at or near
the centre line of the sheet. Figure 2 shows the fracture surface of a typical crack. This
indicates that failure was caused by out of plane alternating bending fatigue loads,
which were not anticipated by the designer. Examination of the fracture surfaces at high
magnification showed the presence of striations and hence confirmed that cracking was
due to fatigue. This is an example of the useful crack path information which can be
obtained from simple examination of a failed component with the naked eye.
A N G LNEO T CFHR A C T U RT EO U G H N EASNS DF A T I G USEP E C I M E N S
By 1965 plane strain fracture toughness testing using ModeI specimens, in which crack
growth is perpendicular to the applied load, was well established [9] but little was
knownabout fracture toughness behaviour under mixed mode loading, where loads are
applied at an angle to the crack. Sometests were therefore carried out in 1966 [10, 11]
to investigate the mixed mode fracture toughness of D T D5050, a 5 ½ %Zn aluminium
alloy with KIc = 28.8 M P a m[10]. A 19 m mthick angle notch specimen was used, with
E of 75q, 60q and 45q, as in Figure 3. Specimens
the initial notch inclined at an angle
were precracked in fatigue. Figure 4 shows the fracture surface of one of the specimens
with the initial notch inclined at E = 45q. The fatigue precrack (bright area at the notch
root) is of nearly constant depth, and at the end of the precrack
E | 48q. A feature of the
test is that under the static loading to determine the fracture toughness the specimen
failed very abruptly, but the macroscopic crack path features followed on from the
fatigue precrack. At the time the fracture surface appearance was puzzling, but is easily
interpreted from a modern viewpoint [4], in that that there is a tendency to ModeI crack
growth on two scales. On a scale of 1 m minitially crack growth was mixed mode. As
the crack grew the crack front rotated until it was perpendicular to the specimen
surfaces, and crack growth was in Mode I, with the exception of shear lips at specimen
surfaces. On this scale the crack follows a curved path which tends towards a plane of
symmetry. This is in accordance with the well knownobservation [4] that the tendency
to ModeI crack growth means that cracks tend to grow perpendicular to the maximum
principal tensile stress. On a smaller scale of 0.1 m mthe tendency to ModeI fatigue
crack growth results in the production of what is knownas a twist crack [4] containing
individual ModeI facets connected by cliffs. The ModeI facets gradually merge as,
viewed on the 1 m mscale, the crack growth surface becomes perpendicular to the
specimen surfaces. Merging of Mode I facets shows up more clearly under fatigue
loading.
Some fatigue tests were carried out in 1989 on 20 m mthick medium strength
E values of 75q, 60q and 45q.
structural steel angle notch specimens [12] with initial
Figure 5 shows the fracture surface of one of the specimens, initial
E = 60q. The light
area at the top is where the specimen was broken open in liquid nitrogen.
These examples illustrate the strong tendency to ModeI crack growth in isotropic
materials under essentially elastic conditions.
Figure 3. Angle notch Charpy specimen, Figure 4. Fracture surface of D T D5050
crack initiation along notch tip.
5 ½Zn aluminium angle notch fracture
toughness test specimen, initial
E = 45q.
Figure 5. Fracture surface of medium Figure 6. Crack path in a Waspaloy
strength structural steel angle notch
sheet under biaxial fatigue load.
E = 60q.
fatigue test specimen, initial
The grid is 2.54 mm.
C R A CPKA T HSTABILITUY N D EBRIAXIAL O A D I N G
The question of the stability of a crack path had been of interest for some time [13] but
in general it wasn’t possible to predict crack paths under biaxial fatigue loading.
Therefore, in 1974 some tests [14], were carried out at room temperature on Waspaloy,
a nickel based gas turbine material, in order to determine the conditions under which a
fatigue crack path became unstable under biaxial loading. The specimens were 254 m m
square and 2.6 m mthick. The material had been cross rolled during production to
ensure that its properties were reasonably isotropic. Tests were carried out using
sinusoidal constant amplitude loading at a stress ratio (ratio of minimumto maximum
load in fatigue cycle), R, of 0.1. In each test the fatigue load perpendicular to the crack
was kept constant. Cracks were first grown from each end of an initial slit under
uniaxial loading. An in phase load was then applied parallel to the crack, and crack path
behaviour observed. Figure 6 shows the crack path for a load parallel to the crack of
twice the load perpendicular to the crack. The crack path became unstable and deviated
from its initial path as soon as the load parallel to the crack was applied. At the time the
tests were carried out it wasn’t possible to do more than describe the results. However,
reanalysis of these and other results in 1997 [4, 15] showed it was possible to correlate
crack path stability in terms of a parameter called the T-stress ratio.
PLASTIDC O M E S T ITCA P
Figure 7. Plastic domestic tap.
Figure 8. Crack surface of plastic
domestic tap.
In 1991 a plastic domestic tap in the author’s utility room was observed to be leaking
where it was screwed into a fitting on the supply pipe. The tap had a fitting for a hose
pipe, and appeared to be a replacement for the original brass tap. Whenan attempt was
made to unscrew the tap it failed completely. The two parts of the broken tap are shown
in Figure 7 and a close up of the fracture surface in Figure 8. The dark area is fatigue
and the light area the final static failure. The age of the tap at the time of failure is
unknown, but as one fatigue cycle is applied each time a tap is turned on and off it is
likely that thousands of cycles had been applied. Safety critical pressure containing
components are often designed to leak-before-break [6] in order to avoid catastrophic
failure. It is fortunate that the tap did so otherwise the utility room would probably have
been flooded. The failed tap was replaced with a brass tap, and it was observed that the
detail design in the vicinity of the threads was exactly the same. The replacement tap is
still in use. The episode is an example of the danger of using a different material for a
component without making appropriate changes to detail design.
W A L CLL O CMKA I N S P R I N G
Before the days of quartz clocks, spring driven wall clocks were widely used in public
buildings. The example shown in Figure 9 was originally used in a school, but since
1968 it has been in use in the author’s kitchen. In 1994 the mainspring failed while the
clock was being wound. Examination showed that this was the final failure following
fatigue crack growth. A general view of the failed mainspring is shown in Figure 10.
Fatigue has been a problem in clock mainsprings for centuries, and traditionally they are
designed using rules of thumb based on experience [16], rather than by detailed
analysis. The total fatigue life is not known, but the clock is wound weekly so it must be
thousands of cycles.
Figure 9. Wall clock by John Davidson, Figure 10. Failed wall clock mainspring.
Coatbridge.
A clock mainspring is loaded in bending, with loading and unloading moving along
the spring as it is woundand unwinds. Whena mainspring breaks in fatigue the crack is
usually straight across the spring, with crack growth predominantly through the
thickness. However, in this particular mainspring crack path behaviour is unusually
complicated, and details are shown in Figure 11. A fatigue crack initiated at a corner at
one edge of the 27 m mwide mainspring. Initially, crack growth was across the spring
(downwards in the picture) but after about 9 m mof growth the crack turned sharply
towards the outer end of the spring (right in the picture), and then grew in a spiral
fashion towards the other edge of the spring until the final failure took place. During
this crack growth two secondary cracks initiated, and then joined so that a small
triangular piece of spring became detached. The joined secondary crack then grew in a
spiral fashion towards the centre of the spring, but did not contribute to the final failure.
This is an example of a nuisance fatigue failure which did not have serious
consequences. Such failures are not normally investigated at all. The offending
component is simply replaced. In this particular case the replacement mainspring is still
intact after 12 years.
Figure 11. Centre portion of failed wall Figure 12. Fracture appearance of mild
steel Charpy specimens tested at 10q C.
clock mainspring.
E = 90q.
Top, standard specimen,
E = 45q.
Bottom, angle notch specimen,
A N G LNEO T CCHH A R PSYP E C I M E N S
Somepreliminary tests [17] were carried out in 1971 on angle notch Charpy specimens,
but crack paths were not investigated in detail. Specimen design was based on the
standard Charpy V-notch specimen with E values (Figure 3) of 90q (standard specimen),
75q, 60q, and 45q. The true notch tip radius was reduced so that the notch tip radius
measured in a plane parallel to the specimen sides was the same as in the standard
Charpy specimen (0.25 mm). Figure 12 shows the appearance of specimens tested at
10q C. More detailed tests were carried out in 1997 using EN6amild steel (0.36% C)
specimens [18]. All specimens were tested in the normalised condition (tensile strength
550 MPa, yield stress 280 MPa). Tests were carried out in a 300 J Charpy machine
equipped with a 2 m mradius striker. They are an example of the complexity often
observed in crack path behaviour under dynamic loading. The fracture surface
appearance of the standard Charpy specimens (E = 90q) is typical of mild steel. In the
lower shelf region, that is at below about -15q C, fracture surfaces are crystalline, and in
the upper shelf region, above about 30q C, they are ductile. In the transition region
fracture surfaces are initially ductile, and the amount of crystalline crack growth
decreases with increasing temperature. Shear lips appear at above about -15q C, and
increase in size with increasing temperature. The fracture appearance transition
temperature (50 per cent crystalline) is about 25q C. In the upper shelf region fracture
surfaces are ductile.
Figure 13. Angle notch Charpy specimen, abrupt transition to crystalline crack growth.
The fracture surface appearance of the angle notch specimens is controlled by a
tendency towards square (Mode I) crack growth, but modified by plasticity and by crack
path constraint due to the initial notch. The value of E has little effect on either the 50
per cent crystalline transition temperature, or on the temperature below which fractures
are crystalline. Shear lips for E = 75q and 60q are similar to those on standard Charpy
specimens, but could not be distinguished for E = 45q. In the transition region fracture
surfaces are initially ductile. The amount of initial ductile crack growth increases with
increasing temperature. Crack initiation is along the notch tip, and in the notch plane, so
the initial crack growth is mixed mode. For E = 75q and 60q a crack twists as it grows,
becoming ModeI as it approaches the striker position (Figure 3). For E = 45q there is an
abrupt transition to ModeI crack growth (Figure 13). This ModeI growth is at least
initially crystalline. At below about -15q C fracture surfaces of the angle notch
specimens are fully crystalline. Crack origins are ModeI. For E = 75q and 60q there are
a number of individual ModeI crack origins along a notch tip, linked by vertical cliffs
(apparently ModeIII). The initial ModeI cracks link up as a crack grows, and overall a
crack twists as it approaches the striker position. For E = 45q the tendency to ModeI
crack growth is so marked that the crack path is not constrained by the notch. At
intermediate absorbed energy levels there is one crack origin at the centre of a notch,
and crack growth is ModeI throughout (Figure 14). At high absorbed energy levels
there are crack origins at both notch corners. The cracks follow curved, apparently
ModeI paths, as shown schematically for a single crack in Figure 15. The two paths
merge as they approach the striker position.
Figure 14. Angle notch Charpy specimen,
Figure 15. Angle notch Charpy specimen,
crack origin at centre of notch.
crack origin at notch corner.
C E N T R AHLE A T I NBGO I L EBR U R N E R
During routine maintenance in 2002 one of the two burners in the gas fired domestic
central heating boiler installed in the author’s house was found to be cracked due to
thermal fatigue. A general view of the burner is shown in Figure 16, and the crack is
shown in Figure 17. The boiler was about 12 years old so, assuming it fired about 10
times per day, about 44,000 thermal fatigue cycles had been applied. The burner
consists of a steel box with a series of small and large holes on top to distribute the gas
to the flame above the box. The larger holes have reinforced perimeters. An internal
wire mesh, just visible in Figure 17, helps to distribute the gas evenly. Cracking appears
to have initiated at three places on the perimeter of a smaller hole, grown into two larger
holes with a small triangular piece becoming detached, and then two cracks grew across
most of the width of the box, resulting in improper combustion. The designer did not
appear to have appreciated the point that stress concentration factors are largely
independent of hole size. The reinforcement had prevented crack initiation at the large
holes but its absence had allowed cracking at a small hole. This is another example of a
nuisance fatigue failure. Annual inspection was recommended by the boiler
manufacturer. This ensured that the cracking was detected before it became dangerous,
and the burner was replaced..
Figure 16. Burner from domestic central heating boiler.
Figure 18. Cracks in sole of walking shoe.
Figure 17. Crack in burner from
domestic central heating boiler.
W A L K I NS HG O E
In 2005 the author found that the plastic soles of pair of walking shoes had become
badly cracked and one no longer fitted properly. This more severely damaged shoe is
shown in Figure 18. The sole of a shoe is subjected to repeated bending. Going uphill a
sole is also subjected to repeated tension as the rearward force applied by the wearer’s
heel is transferred to the ground. This particular pair of shoes had covered several
hundred kilometres, which is equivalent to around 3 u 105 cycles. In the shoe shown
two separate cracks had initiated in grooves near the toe, grown past each other and then
curved together, in a well known crack path behaviour [19], so that a piece of sole
became detached. The heel had also cracked and, in what appears to have been the final
event that reduced the stiffness of the shoe so much that it became unusable, the sole
separated from the upper at the end of this crack. The use of a plastic, instead of rubber,
for the soles has reduced the rate of wear but led to fatigue failure. This is another
example where a change of material has resulted in fatigue cracking.
C O N C L U D IRNEGM A R K S
Paths taken by cracks have been of industrial interest for a very long time [7, 8]. A large
amount of empirical knowledge has been accumulated, but at the present state of the art
the factors controlling the path taken by a crack are not completely understood.
The numerous possible crack configurations [20] mean that a systematic approach to
the determination of crack paths isn't feasible, so particular practical problems need to
be tackled on an ad hoc basis. In carrying out analyses care has to be taken to view
crack paths at an appropriate scale.
The examples given have been chosen from the author’s experience to illustrate
some of the more important aspects of crack paths. Many more examples are included
in the invited and contributed papers presented during the Conference.
References
[1] McClintock, F.A. and Irwin, G.R. (1965) In: Fracture Toughness Testing and its
Applications. ASTMSTP 381, pp. 84-113, American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
[2] Carpinteri, A. and Pook, L. P. (Ed). (2003). Proceedings (on CD) of the
International Conference on Fatigue Crack Paths (FCP2003) Parma (Italy), 18
20 September 2003. University of Parma.
[3] Carpinteri, A. and Pook, L. P. (2005) Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 28, 1.
[4] Pook, L. P. (2002) Crack Paths.: W I TPress, Southampton.
[5] Marsh, K. J. (Ed).( 1988) Full-Scale Testing of Components and Structures.
Butterworth Scientific Ltd,. Guildford:
[6] Pook, L. P. (2000) Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics for Engineers. Theory and
Applications. W I TPress, Southampton.
[7] Cazaud, R. (1953) Fatigue of metals. Chapman& Hall Ltd,. London.
[8] Longson, J. (1961) A photographic study of the origin and development of fatigue
fractures in aircraft structures. RAE Report No. Struct 267. Royal Aircraft
Establishment, Farnborough.
[9] Srawley, J. E and Brown, W. F. (1965) Fracture toughness testing methods. In
Fracture toughness testing and its applications. A S T MSTP 381. American
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 133-198.
[10] Pook, L. P. (1968) Brittle Fracture of Structural Materials Having a High
Strength Weight Ratio. PhDthesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
[11]
Pook, L. P. (1971) The effect of crack angle on fracture toughness. Eng. fract.
Mech., 3, 205-218.
[12]
Pook, L. P. and Crawford, D. G. (1991) The fatigue crack direction and threshold
behaviour of a medium strength structural steel under mixed Mode I and III
loading. In: Kussmaul, K., McDiarmid, D. L. and Socie, D. F. (Ed). Fatigue
Under Biaxial and Multiaxial Loading. ESIS 10. pp. 199-211. Mechanical
Engineering Publications, London.
[13]
Cotterell, B. (1966) Notes on the paths and stability of cracks. Int. J. fract. Mech.,
2, 526-533.
[14]
Pook, L. P. and Holmes, R. (1976) In: Proc. Fatigue Testing and Design Conf.
Vol. 2, pp. 36.1-36.33. Society of Environmental Engineers Fatigue Group,
Buntingford, Herts:
[15]
Pook, L. P. (1998). An alternative crack path stability parameter. In: Brown, M.
W., de los Rios, E. R. and Miller, K. J. (Eds). Fracture from Defects. E C F12.
Vol. I, pp. 187-192. E M A SPublishing, Cradley Heath, West Midlands.
[16]
Britten, F. J. (1978) The watch & clock makers' handbook, dictionary and guide. 16th Edition. Revised by Good, R. Arco Publishing CompanyInc, N e wYork.
[17]
Pook, L. P. (1972) The effect of notch angle on the behaviour of Charpy
testpieces. Eng. fract. Mech., 483-486.
[18]
Pook, L. P. and Podbury, M. J. (1998) Failure mechanism map for angle notch
Charpy tests on a mild steel. Int. J. Fract., 90, L3-L8.
[19]
Melin, S. W h ydo cracks avoid each other? Int. J. Fract. 1983, 23(1), 37-45.
[20]
Pook, L.P. (1986) Keyword Scheme for a Computer Based Bibliography of Stress
Intensity Factor Solutions. NEL Report 704. National Engineering Laboratory,
East Kilbride, Glasgow.
Progress in Identifying the Real 'Keffective
in the Threshold Region and Beyond
Paul C. Paris 1, Diana Lados 2, and Hiroshi Tada1
University, St. Louis, M O ,USA. pcp@me.wustl.edu
1 W a s h i n g t o n
2 W o r c e s t e r Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA,USA. lados@wpi.edu
A B S T R A C The use of the crack tip stress intensity factor, K, has survived almost 50
years as the key parameter correlating fatigue crack growth. As time past the range of
the stress intensity, 'K, was recognized as causing alternating plasticity at the crack
tip. The threshold level for ' Kwas discovered. Further the occurrence of crack closure
was noted which effected the 'Kfor different load ratios, R, of cyclic loading. The
A S T Mmethod of counting the linear part of the load displacement for determining
'Kopen
'Keffective,
was found to understate the
which correlates data for different
load ratios. One approach to adjust for this problem is the “Partial Closure Model”,
where the closure only occurs away from the crack tip. Here it will be discussed that
such a model leads to a universal growth law. Moreover, this law shows application in
estimating the order of magnitude of crack growth life (>107cycles) for example with
very high cycle fatigue (>109cycles). Some advances in this application will also be
cited.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
The use of the elastic crack tip stress intensity factor, K, was submitted for publication
in 1959 [1] and was promptly rejected by 3 major journals (ASME,AIAAand a U K
journal). In all three cases the reviewers argued that an elastic parameter could not
correlate fatigue crack growth data because plasticity must be involved. Figure 1 shows
the original plots of data from three independent sources on 2 aluminum alloys showing
the correlation of data ignored by those reviewers. Further discussion appears in a
subsequent paper [2], comparing earlier suggested parameters based on more limited
data. The wide range of data provided by McEvily [3] settled this search for K as the
leading parameter of interest. It is acknowledged that McEvily introduced a stress
concentration type parameter, which was a less popular but correct approach.
Figure 1 The original 1959 correlation of data on 2024 and 7075 aluminum alloys [1].
In this later paper [3] the power law of crack growth was presented in terms of the
range of the stress intensity, 'K,with a constant, C, dependant on the load ratio, R, to
express the growth rate as:
daN C ' K n
where C=C(R)
This form was merely an empirical fit of McEvily’s data over a wide range of growth
rates (5+ log cycles). It was observed by Hertzberg that this law failed at rates below
one Burger’s vector, b, per cycle by leveling to a threshold ' K (private communication
1964). Even earlier Anderson [4] noted that growth rates were similar for all metal
alloys if the stress intensity range was normalized by dividing by elastic modulus, E.
It was later in the 1960’s that Elber [5] drew attention to crack closure in fatigue,
although closure was noted by Christensen [6] much earlier. Thereafter, [7] Hertzberg
noticed that for load ratios, R, above 0.7, where no closure occurs, that the preceding
law herein can be madeuniversal for all metal alloys as:
n
§ E' Kb © ¨ · ¹ ¸
da
' K
b
1
where n = 3 and threshold occurs for
E b
dN
Indeed this empirical law works for a wide variety of steels; aluminum, titanium,
magnesium, and copper-beryllium alloys [7]. It remains to develop this law to an even
more universal form by finding a 'Keffective
so that it may be applied to all load ratios,
R, by including the effects of crack closure.
T H ES E A R CFHO R 'Keffective
W I T HC R A CCKL O S U RPER E S E N T
There is no analytical method of calculating the crack closure (or opening) level during
cyclic loading. For variable amplitude there is also no method. The A S T Mhas tried to
develop a method (see A S T ME 647-00) of measuring the opening load by determining
the load level for which the load displacement record becomes linear as the crack peals
open. Data in terms of load vs. displacement is analyzed to obtain the point at which the
deviation from subsequent linearity is a certain small % of that slope. This load is used
Kopening,
Kmax,
to compute
which along with the maximumload for
is used to
compute a stress intensity range as:
' K K max K open
open
' K causing fatigue crack growth.
This was at one time regarded as the relevant
However, precise computer controlled load-displacement data from Donald [8] covers a
wide range of load ratios, R. It shows that the A S T Mmethod does not well correlate the
data of widely differing load ratios. It improves correlation at high stress intensities but
worsens correlation near threshold. This effect is shown on Figures 2 and 3. Donald [9]
Figure 2 Data on 7055 aluminum alloy using applied stress intensity range,'K , [10].
proposed the “Adjusted Compliance Ratio Method” and also noted [10] a minor effect
of Kmax
in the data. See Figures 4 and 5. After several years of consideration there is
no known model or theory to justify this A C Rmethod. On the other hand the “Partial
Closure Model” [11] will be revisited here, which does have a physical and analytical
basis. With it we shall show that the preceding normalized power law can be made
universal for all load ratios.
Figure 3 Data on 7055 using the A S T M' K method, [10]. opening
Figure 4 Data on 7055 using Donald’s Adjusted Compliance 'KACR method, [10].
Figure 5 Data on 7055 using ' K A C R and with Donald’s adjustment for K , [10]. max
T H EP A R T I ACLL O S U RMEO D EFLO R 'Keffective
The doctoral dissertation of Bowles [12] noticed that with cyclic fatigue crack closure a
region near the crack tip stays open at minimumload. Whether closure is due to
plasticity, asperities on the surface, or fragments etc it can be modeled as a rigid layer of
height, 2h, extending into the crack a distance, d, from the tip. Figure 6 shows the
Figure 6 The computational model for the partial closure method [11].
model for (a) minimumload and (b) at opening load when crack closure occurs. For the
condition at full unloading, (a), the crack tip stress intensity is found to be:
Sd
Eh 2Sd V nom min
Keff min
2
For (b) at opening load the stress intensity is:
S
K open
E2h
2d
Combining these gives:
Sd
nom min
2 SKopen
K eff min
V
2
Where Vnom min
is the nominal tensile stress perpendicular to the crack with the
crack absent. Since the term is quite small because d is also small, it can be neglected.
Consequently it is seen that the minimumeffective stress intensity is very nearly:
K # 2K eff min S
open
As follows from this we have called this the “Partial Closure Model” or 2/Pi0 – method
where the effective stress intensity range is:
2 K K #Kmax S K
' K
effective
max eff min
open
This implies that the A S T Mopening stress intensity should be reduced by
2 S to correctly compute the real stress intensity range. Figure 7 shows
approximately
the same preceding data of Donald from Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 where the data is
correlated quite closely into a single curve. Though this is data on a single material the
reader will find many other materials with comparative correlations in the references
cited herein.
Figure 7 Data on 7055 using the partial closure model (2/Pi0) 'Keff.
The Partial Closure Model is emphasized here with some reservation. All physical
models are crude approximations of reality and this one is no exception. However it
happens to helpfully correlate data for considerations of whether the data is well
founded and whether the material is not an oddity. The A C Rmethod of Donald serves
this same purpose in general. At least for one material he has tested, Donald has
acknowledged (private communication) that the Partial Closure Model provides tighter
correlation. The disadvantage of both of these models is that closure load levels must be
measured experimentally, which make the data difficult to use in practical applications
to life prediction. In any case these correlations do help to show that ' K as modified
for closure is the primary and dominant variable causing fatigue cracking.
It is of further interest to also revisit the preceding cubic power law using the
effective stress intensity range developed here.
T H EU N I V E R S ALLA WO FM E C H A N I CFA LT I G UCE R A CGKR O W T H
In order to make the previous third power law herein into a universal law for all load
ratios, R, it is only necessary to substitute the effective stress intensity factor. It is
acknowledge that a small effect of the maximumstress intensity factor is present, as
illustrated in Figure 5. Since this effect is minor it shall be ignored in further discussion.
Consequently, the “Universal Law”is stated as:
da dN #b ' K eff § E b
3
da dN d b
·
'EKeffb
where for threshold
and
#1
© ¨
¹ ¸
This Universal Law is a good approximation for all data on metal alloys known to
these authors but is only an approximation. Figure 8 shows the results of the plotted
lines of the law as compared to data 7055 aluminum (a very good fit) and for 2324
aluminum (a good fit except this alloy exhibits a superior threshold or larger Burger’s
vector). These are extremes in the precision of fit and again the reader will find further
supporting evidence in the references herein, especially [7]. The Universal Law is
suggested to provide a maximumgrowth rate limit for data not influenced by aggressive
environments. It applies equally well to “small cracks” as a maximumgrowth rate. As
such it can be used in estimates of minimumand order of magnitude estimates of crack
growth lives for many applications.
Figure 8 Data on both 7055 and 2324 with predicted lines from the Universal Law.
For example in a series of applications to Very High Cycle Fatigue, >108 cycles,
exhibiting failure initiation from internal metallurgical discontinuities, this law can be
used to show that the accompanying crack growth life is much smaller, <106 cycles.
Therefore, V H C Flife is dominated by initiation of cracking, see [13-17].
Dimensional Considerations of the Universal Law
The immediately above power law is noted to be dimensionally correct. If only the
effective stress intensity range, the maximumstress intensity, the elastic modulus, and
the Burger’s vector are present in the growth rate law, then the non-dimensional
parameters involve are: dN, dba , 'EKeff b. and EKmax b
. Restricting the parameters to these
items is strongly supported by the preceding data. A general form of the law can then be
written as:
§
·
da b F 'Keff , K max
© ¨
¹ ¸
E bE b
dN
It is acknowledged that b could be a micro-structural characteristic of the material of the
order of the Burger’s vector (such as micro-constituent phase size, etc.). However the
Universal Law applied to data in all cases strongly supports the third power effect, i.e. a
3
§
·
growth rate proportional to ' K eff
. As a consequence the law becomes:
© ¨
¹ ¸
E b
da dN b§ 'EKeff b ·
3F1KmaxEb§©¨·¹¸
© ¨
¹ ¸
¸ AKmaxEb§©¨·¹¸
m
Donald [10] in his work chooses: F 1 K max §
·
, (with m = 1) in an attempt
© ¨
¹ E b
to fit the data even better and where A is a non-dimensional constant. This choice might
be subject to further investigation. However, with that choice the law becomes:
3
m
§
·
' K eff § E b ·
da dN Ab
Kmax
© ¨
¹ ¸
¹ ¸
© ¨
E b
where threshold occurs at:
§ 'EKeffb ,EKmax b ·
F
B
© ¨
¹¸
and where B is also a dimensionless constant.
It is noted that the Universal Lawas previously stated above is within the restrictions
of these dimensional considerations. Other attempts to formulate laws of mechanical
fatigue crack growth incorporating other factors (such as yield stress, etc.) are contrary
to the broad trends of data used in implying and developing the Universal Law through
the analysis here.
It remains for someone to give a full physical explanation of the fact that stress
intensity divided by elastic modulus times square root of Burger’s vector is show by all
the data on metal alloys to be the universal normalizing factor. Further, the influence of
environment remains another effect requiring attention as well.
C O N C L U S I O N S
(1) The power law of stress intensity factor range, 'K, has withstood almost 50
years of exploration and remains the most dominant parameter causing fatigue
crack growth.
(2) Crack closure effects the stress intensity range.
(3) The A S T Mmethod of determining open load and thereby'K does not open
adequately express the full stress intensity range with closure.
(4) Following the work of Bowles, the Partial Closure Model shows a 'Keff greater
than the A S T Mmethod. Donald’s A C Rmethod also correlates data better but
lacks an analytical model’s justification.
(5) All fatigue crack growth data strongly show that dividing the stress intensity by
elastic modulus times square root of Burger’s vector normalizes that data.
(6) From the previous conclusions a Universal Power Law of mechanical fatigue
crack growth for all metal alloys has been reviewed and presented herein.
(7) This Universal Lawmay be affected in a minor way by the maximumapplied
stress intensity and sometimes in major ways by environmental influences.
(8) Applications of this Universal Law are only good for order of magnitude
estimates of minimumcrack growth lives (for example for very high cycle
fatigue >108 applications).
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S
The encouragement of the Washington University (St. Louis) Dean of Engineering,
Christopher Byrnes and Dr. A. K. Vasudevan of the U.S. Office of Naval Research
in producing this work is due great thanks. Effective help in developing the
manuscript by Nancy Rubin is also acknowledged with thanks.
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Paris, P. C., Gomez, M. P., And Anderson, W. E., (1961) The Trend in
Engineering, 1, 9-14.
2. Paris, P. C. and Erdogan, F., (1963) Trans. of ASME, J. of Basic
Engineering 85, 528-534.
3. McEvily, A. J. Jr. and Illg, W. (1958) N A C AT N4394.
4. Donaldson, D. R. and Anderson, W. E. (1961) Proceedings of the Crack
Propagation Symposium,2, Cranfield, England.
5.
Elber, W.(1970) Engin. Fracture Mech., 2, 37-45.
6.
Christensen, R. H. (1963) Appl. Mat. Res. October 207-210.
7. Hertzberg, R. W. , (1996) Deformation and Fracture Mech. of Eng. Mat. – 4th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, N e wYork.
8. Donald, J. K. (2003) Private communication of 7055 and 2324 data, Fracture
Technology Associates, Bethlehem, Pa.
9. Donald, J. K., Bray, G. H. and Bush, R. W., (1997) A S T M –STP1332.
10. Donald, J. K., Bray, G. H. and Bush, R. W. (1997) High Cycle Fatigue of
Struct. Mat., T M S123-141.
Paris, P. C., Tada, H. and Donald, J. K. (1999) Int. Jour Fatigue. 21.
11.
Bowles, Q. (1972) Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University, The Netherlands.
12.
13. Bathias, C. and Paris, P. C.,(2005) Gigacycle Fatigue in Mechanical
Practice, Marcel Dekker, N e wYork.
14.
Paris, P. C., Marines-Garcia, I., Hertzberg, R. W. and Donald, J. K. (2004) Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Very High Cycle Fatigue, Ritsumeikan Univ.,
Kusatsu. Japan, 1-13.
15. Marines-Garcia, I., Paris, P. C., Tada, H., Bathias, C. and Lados, D., (2006) Proceedings of the T M SSymp. To Honor the 80th Birthday of A. J. McEvily,
to be published in Int. Jour. Fatigue.
16.
Marines-Garcia, I., Paris, P. C., Tada, H. and Bathias, C. (2006) Proceedings
of Fatigue 2006 Conference, Atlanta, Ga., to be published.
17.
Marines-Garcia, I., Paris, P. C., Tada, H. and Bathias, C. (2006) Proceedings
of the Internat. Conf. on Fatigue Damageof Struct. Mat. VI, Hyannis, Ma.
To be published.
Fatigue Crack Path and Threshold in ModeII and ModeIII
Loadings
Y. Murakami1,Y. Fukushima1, K. Toyama2and S. Matsuoka1
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka,
Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan, ymura@mech.kyusyu-u.ac.jp
2 Forensic Science Laboratory, Fukuoka Prefectural Police Headquarters, 7-7 Higashi
Koen, Hakata-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8576, Japan.
ABSTRACTI.n order to investigate the crack path under ModeII or ModeIII loadings,
reversed torsion tests were carried out on SAE52100and ModeII fatigue crack growth
tests were carried out on 0.47 % carbon steel specimens. In the torsional fatigue test
(SAE52100), the type of inclusion in the torsional fatigue fracture origin was slender
MnS inclusions which are elongated in the longitudinal direction. The cracks first
propagated by ModeII up to crack length 2a = 100 ~ 200 Pm (which are almost equal
to the length of MnS inclusion) in the longitudinal direction, and then branched by
Mode I to the direction (~ ± 70.5 deg.) perpendicular to the local maximumnormal
stress (VTmax) at the crack tip.
In the ModeII fatigue crack growth test (0.47 % carbon steel) in air and in a vacuum,
the cracks first propagated by ModeII. After the ModeII fatigue crack growth stopped,
the crack branched to the direction perpendicular to the local maximumnormal stress
(VTmax) at the crack tip, and finally branched to the angle close to the direction
perpendicular to the remote maximumprincipal stresses.
A fibrous pattern on the ModeII fatigue fracture surface tested in a vacuum was clearer
than that in air. The ModeII threshold stress intensity factor ranges, 'KIIth
= 10.2 M P a
m (Longitudinal crack) and 'KIIth
= 12.5 M P a (mTransverse crack) in a vacuum
'KIIth
= 9.4 M P a m(Longitudinal crack) and 'KIIth =
were higher than those in air,
m (Transverse crack). Both in a vacuum and in air, the values of 'KIIth for
10.8 M P a
crack growth perpendicular to the rolling direction were higher than those for crack
growth parallel to the rolling direction.
The values of KII and KIII at a 3D elliptical crack tip under shear stress were analyzed
to investigate the shear crack growth pattern in materials. The 3D crack analysis shows
that the most stable aspect ratio b/a of a small planar elliptical crack under cyclic shear
stress is b/a = 0.49 in absence of friction at crack surfaces. The aspect ratio b/a = 0.49
can be explained by the equal resistance against fatigue crack growth both in ModeII
However, the aspect ratio b/a for the failure of a real
'KIIth
= 'KIIIth.
and ModeIII, i.e.
railway wheel did not stay at the stable aspect ratio b/a = 0.49 and continued
decreasing. The cause for the decrease in the aspect ratio b/a smaller than 0.49 was
revealed to be the friction between crack surfaces.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
ModeII fatigue failure occurs in several components such as bearings, gears, rails, rolls,
etc., as the damage types of shelling, spalling and pitting. The origins of the ModeII
fatigue crack are surface or subsurface of components. ModeII fatigue crack starting
from surface propagates in air or with lubricant. ModeII fatigue crack initiating from
subsurface inclusions is thought to propagate in a vacuum. It has been reported that in
ModeI fatigue crack growth, the crack growth behaviour in air is different from that in
a vacuum [1-5]. Kikukawa et al. [2] and Jono et al. [3] reported that the ModeI crack
growth threshold 'KIth in a vacuum was higher than that in air and the crack growth
resistance was increased in a vacuum. McEvily et al. [4] reported that the crack tip
opening displacement (CTOD)in a vacuum is larger than that in air due to the lack of
oxidation. Thus, the ModeII fatigue crack growth behaviours in a vacuum can also be
different from those in air.
In this study, the Mode II fatigue crack path and the threshold value 'KIIth under
ModeII loading and ModeII + III crack growth under torsional fatigue loading were
studied. The influence of a vacuumenvironment on the ModeII fatigue threshold and a
3D shear crack growth behaviours under Mode II and Mode III loading were also
investigated.
E X P E R I M E N TPARLO C E D U R E S
Torsional fatigue test
Table 1 shows the chemical composition of a bearing steel, SAE52100. The Vickers
hardness, measured with a load 0.98 N, is H V= 797. The scatter of H Vmeasured at 12
points is within 11%.
Figure 1 shows the shape and dimensions of the torsional fatigue test specimen. After
finishing the specimen surface with emery paper, the surface layer was removed by
electro-polishing. A hydraulically controlled biaxial fatigue testing machine was used.
Tests were conducted under load control at a frequency of 0.1 ~ 0.2 Hz. Crack paths
were measured by using replica method.
Table 1. Chemical composition of SAE52100(wt. %)
C Si
M n P
S
Ni
Cr
M o Cu Al
Ti
O (ppm)
0.992 0.27
0.39 0.015 0.005 0.08
1.4
0.03
0.11 0.008 0.030
6
85.1R2 R02
50.4
.
50.4
142
Figure 1. Torsional fatigue test specimens (mm).
ModeII fatigue crack growth test in a vacuum
In comparison with the ModeII fatigue crack growth behaviours in air [10-12], ModeII
fatigue crack growth tests in a vacuumwere conducted by using 0.47% carbon steel.
Table 2 shows the chemical composition of the 0.47 % carbon steel. Specimens were
machined after annealing at 844°C, for 1h. After turning specimen, the specimens were
annealed in a vacuumat 600°C for 1h to relieve the residual stress introduced by turning.
The Vickers hardness after vacuum annealing is H V= 196. The scatter of H Vmeasured
at 4 points is within 5 %.
Figure 2(a) shows the shape and dimensions of the ModeII fatigue crack growth test
specimen. The ModeII fatigue crack growth tests were conducted by using the specially
designed double cantilever (DC) type specimen designed by Murakamiand Hamada [6
8]. The specimen has a chevron notch and side grooves in the slit. This specimen
enables 'KII-decreasing test under a constant load amplitude. Twoseries of specimen
were prepared. One is for ModeII fatigue crack growth parallel to the rolling directions
(Longitudinal crack) and another is for ModeII fatigue crack growth perpendicular to
the rolling directions (Transverse crack).
Figure 2(b) shows the Mode II fatigue test system in a vacuum. A conventional
tension-compression fatigue testing machine was used with a pair of the specimens.
Test method details are given in Ref. [6-8]. Tests were conducted at a constant load
amplitude, 'P= 11.8 kNwith R = -1 and at a frequency of 6 Hz. In order to conduct the
ModeII fatigue crack growth test in a vacuum, the vacuumchamber was installed to the
fatigue testing machine. An oil sealed rotary pump and turbo-molecular pump were
used to make a vacuum condition. The maximumvacuum pressure in the chamber is
about 2×10-3 Pa.
Table 2. Chemical composition of 0.47 % carbon steel (wt. %)
C
Si
M n
P
S
Cr
Cu
Ni
ModeII specimen
0.47
0.20
0.67
0.010
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.02
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software