PSI - Issue 64
A. Codina et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 64 (2024) 1500–1507 Alba Codina/ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
1502
3
Table 1. Prediction models for ICD considered in this paper. Reference Strength model
Eq.
Adhesive strength P EB (analytical model from Chen et al. (2018)) = · 1 1 Frictional strength P HB (analytical model from Chen et al. (2018)) = u = 0.96 (from Wu et al. (2010)) = where M t = torque applied to one bolt k = twisting coefficient calibrated to be 0.001264 m where 1 =√( 1 · + 1 · ) · 1 1
Chen et al. (2019)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Zhang et al. (2021)
Adhesive strength P EB (Teng et al. (2003)) = · · · · √ √ where α = 0.48 or 0.94 for EB, and 0.48 for HB 1 =√ 2− / 1+ / ≥1 = { 2 for ≤ 1 for > Frictional strength P HB (from Gao (2020)) = u = 0.96 (from Wu et al. (2010)) = 2 · where k l = twisting coefficient calibrated to be 0.218 d l = fastener diameter =√ · √
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Gao et al. (2023)
Adhesive strength P EB (Modifying the model from Teng et al. (2003) to include the effect of the anchor spacing, denoted as S a ) = · · · · · √ √ +410 (11) where α = 0.48 or 0.94 for EB, and 0.48 for HB 1 ={ 1 ≥ < (12) Frictional strength P HB (from Gao (2020))
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker