PSI - Issue 64

Laura Fernandez Resta et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 64 (2024) 2165–2172 Laura Fernandez Resta / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2023) 000 – 000

2172

8

collaboration among stakeholders. Despite its limitations, the proposed research holds the promise of contributing to the effective integration of decision-making processes into the management of historic buildings by reaching the development of a task list and a user-oriented workflow for the integration of MCDM and HBIM. Acknowledgments This contribution is made possible by the support of the BIMLab of HafenCity University. References Altohami, A.B.A., Haron, N.A., Ales@Alias, A.H., Law, T.H., 2021. Investigating Approaches of Integrating BIM, IoT, and Facility Management for Renovating Existing Buildings: A Review. Sustainability 13, 3930. Andrich, W., Daniotti, B., Pavan, A., Mirarchi, C., 2022. Check and Validation of Building Information Models in Detailed Design Phase: A Check Flow to Pave the Way for BIM Based Renovation and Construction Processes. Buildings 12, 154. Barontini, A., Alarcon, C., Sousa, H.S., Oliveira, D.V., Masciotta, M.G., Azenha, M., 2021. Development and Demonstration of an HBIM Framework for the Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 16, 1451 – 1473. Borrmann, A., Beetz, J., Koch, C., Liebich, T., Muhic, S., 2018. Industry Foundation Classes: A Standardized Data Model for the Vendor-Neutral Exchange of Digital Building Models. In: Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., Beetz, J. (Eds.), Building Information Modeling - Technology Foundations and Industry Practice. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 81 – 126. Gerbino, S., Cieri, L., Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G., 2021. On BIM Interoperability via the IFC Standard: An Assessment from the Structural Engineering and Design Viewpoint. Applied Sciences 11, 11430. Guzzetti, F., Anyabolu, K.L.N., Biolo, F., D’Ambrosio, L., 2021. BIM for Existing Construction: A Different Logic Scheme and an Alternative Semantic to Enhance the Interoperabilty. Applied Sciences 11, 1855. Hossain, M.A., Yeoh, J.K.W., 2018. BIM for Existing Buildings: Potential Opportunities and Barriers. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. p. 012051. Khan, M., Khan, M., Bughio, M., Talpur, B., Kim, I., Seo, J., 2022. An Integrated HBIM Framework for the Management of Heritage Buildings. Buildings 12, 964. Lasarte, N., Elguezabal, P., Sagarna, M., Leon, I., Otaduy, J.P., 2021. Challenges for Digitalisation in Building Renovation to Enhance the Efficiency of the Process: A Spanish Case Study. Sustainability 13, 12139. Liu, J., Foreman, G., Sattineni, A., Li, B., 2023. Integrating Stakeholders’ Priorities into Level of Development Supplementa l Guidelines for HBIM Implementation. Buildings 13, 530. Lunenburg, F.C., 2010. The Decision Making Process. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal 27. Lupica Spagnolo, S., Signorini, M., Vesanen, T., Pavan, A., Kousouris, S., 2022. Information Requirements for an Efficient Renovation Process. In: Daniotti, B., Lupica Spagnolo, S., Pavan, A., Bolognesi, C.M. (Eds.), Innovative Tools and Methods Using BIM for an Efficient Renovation in Buildings, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1 – 15. Mansuri, L.E., Patel, D.A., Udeaja, C., Makore, B.C.N., Trillo, C., Awuah, K.G.B., Jha, K.N., 2022. A Systematic Mapping of BIM and Digital Technologies for Architectural Heritage. SASBE 11, 1060 – 1080. Marzouk, M., 2023. HBIM Framework for Rehabilitation of Heritage Buildings. In: El-Qady, G.M., Margottini, C. (Eds.), Sustainable Conservation of UNESCO and Other Heritage Sites Through Proactive Geosciences, Springer Geology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 275 – 284. Menzel, K., Törmä, S., Markku, K., Tsatsakis, K., Hryshchenko, A., Lucky, M.N., 2022. Linked Data and Ontologies for Semantic Interoperability. In: Daniotti, B., Lupica Spagnolo, S., Pavan, A., Bolognesi, C.M. (Eds.), Innovative Tools and Methods Using BIM for an Efficient Renovation in Buildings, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 17 – 28. Murphy, M., McGovern, E., Pavia, S., 2009. Historic Building Information Modelling (HBIM). Structural Survey 27, 311 – 327. Radanovic, M., Khoshelham, K., Fraser, C., 2021. A Platform for Multilayered Documentation of Cultural Heritage. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. pp. 9 – 15. Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., Roy, R., 2015. A Review of Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods for Enhanced Maintenance Delivery. In: Procedia CIRP. pp. 30 – 35. Sagarna, M., Otaduy, J.P., Mora, F., Leon, I., 2022. Analysis of the State of Building Conservation through Study of Damage and Its Evolution with the State of Conservation Assessment BIM Model (SCABIM). Applied Sciences 12, 7259. Santini, S., Borghese, V., Baggio, C., 2023. HBIM-Based Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Diagnosis and Conservation of Historical Timber Structures. Sustainability 15, 3003. Saricaoglu, T., Saygi, G., 2022. Data-Driven Conservation Actions of Heritage Places Curated with HBIM. Virtual Archaeol. Rev. 13, 17 – 32. Taher Tolou Del, M.S., Saleh Sedghpour, B., Kamali Tabrizi, S., 2020. The Semantic Conservation of Architectural Heritage: the Missing Values. Herit Sci 8, 70. Tan, T., Mills, G., Papadonikolaki, E., Liu, Z., 2021. Combining Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods with Building Information Modelling (BIM): A Review. Automation in Construction 121, 103451. Vitasek, S., 2022. The Use of the BIM Method for Sustainable Care of Historic Buildings: Methodological Framework. In: Horák, J., Lee, T., Dolejšová, E. (Eds.), SHS Web of Conferences. p. 01023.