PSI - Issue 64

Sadeq Mo. Annooz et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 64 (2024) 1565–1572 Annooz, Williams, and Myers / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2024) 000–000

1572

8

diameter rebars can be attributed to the pronounced nonlinear stress distribution during pull-out tests, the significant diameter reduction under tension due to the Poisson effect, and the increased brittleness and elastic energy associated with larger diameters.  ACI 440.1R-15 Eq. 10.1c: The BFRP test results in this study exceeded the ACI predicted developable bar stress currently in the ACI 440.1R-15 document. However, some other data collected in the 2024 database study by Myers (2024) did not. Acknowledgements The research team expresses its deepest gratitude to the support staff and technicians in the Dept of Civil, Arch. and Envir. Engineering (CArEE), the Missouri Center for Transportation Innovation (MCTI) and the Center for Infrastructure Engineering Studies (CIES) at Missouri S&T. The lab technician at Missouri University of Science and Technology provided crucial assistance and technical expertise during the experimental phases of this project. References AASHTO, 2007. AASHTO, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC. ACI Committee 318, and American Concrete Institute, 2011. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. ACI Committee 408, 2003. ACI 408R-03: Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension, Farmington Hills, MI. Al-Khafaji, A.F., Myers, J.J. and Alghazali, H.H., 2021. Evaluation of Bond Performance of Glass Fiber Rebars Embedded in Sustainable Concrete, Journal of Cleaner Production, 282. ASTM C39, 2020. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens 1, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM D7205, 2021. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM A615, 2018. Designation: A615/A615M-08b Designation: A 615/A 615M-09 Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement 1, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C192, 2019. Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory 1, West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C496, 2014. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens 1, West Conshohocken, PA. Dong, Z., Wu, G., Xu, B., Wang, X., and Taerwe, L., 2016. Bond Durability of BFRP Bars Embedded in Concrete under Seawater Conditions and the Long-Term Bond Strength Prediction, Materials & Design 92: pp. 552–62. Köliö, A., Honkanen, M., Lahdensivu, J., Vippola, M., and Pentti, M., 2015. “Corrosion Products of Carbonation Induced Corrosion in Existing Reinforced Concrete Facades.” Cement and Concrete Research 78: 200–207. 2015.07.009. Bank, L.C., 2006. Composites for Construction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, pp 551. Militký, Ji ř í, Vladimír Kova č i č , and Jitka Rubnerová, 2002. Influence of Thermal Treatment on Tensile Failure of Basalt Fibers.” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69(9): 1025–33. Myers, J.J., 2024. Review and Analysis of FRP Bond Lengths from Pull-out Testing Database with Reduced Embedment Lengths, American Concrete Institute (ACI) Special Publication 360, Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS), Farmington Hills, MI, SP-360-02, pp. 25-35. Nanni, A., De Luca, A., and Zadeh, H.J., 2014. Reinforced Concrete with FRP Bars, CRC Press, London, UK, pp 418. RILEM 7-II-128, 1994. RC6: Bond Test for Reinforcing Steel-Pullout Test,’ RILEM Technical Recommendations for the Testing and Use of Construction Materials, E and FN Spon, U.K. Baena M., Torres L., Turon A., and Barris C. 2029. Experimental study of bond behaviour between concrete and FRP bars using a pull-out test, Composite Part B 40, pp. 784-797