PSI - Issue 64

Maysam Jalilkhani et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 64 (2024) 161–167 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000

167

7

7. Conclusions The review presented in this paper emphasizes the initial framework provided by empirical and numerical methods for assessing building damage under mining-induced loads. However, their direct applicability beyond their original contexts is limited by variations in mining activities, terrain characteristics, and structural types. Analyzing ground movement type at building locations is important for accurately predicting potential effects of subsidence or seismic events. Therefore, methods effective in one region require adaptation and validation to local conditions, potentially involving modifications for mineral exploitation conditions or building types. Although numerical models offer a comprehensive view of building behavior subjected to ground subsidence and seismic forces, their application on a city-wide scale is time-consuming and challenging. The methodology proposed herein combines these methods, enabling detailed damage assessment from city to building scales and optimizing resource utilization. References Boscardin, M.D. and E.J. Cording, 1989. Building response to excavation-induced settlement. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 115(1). Boone, S.J., 1996. Ground-movement-related building damage. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 122(11): p. 886-896. Boone, S., 2001. Assessing construction and settlement-induced building damage: a return to fundamental principles. Underground Construction, 34(2): p. 559-570. Burland, J.B. and C. Wroth, Settlement of buildings and associated damage. 1975. Burland, J., 1995. Assessment of risk of damage to buildings due to tunnelling and excavatioins. in 1st Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotech. Engrg., IS-Tokyo'95. Cai, Y., Verdel, T., Deck, O., 2020. Using plane frame structural models to assess building damage at a large scale in a mining subsidence area. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 24(3), 283–306. Camós, C. and C. Molins, 3D analytical prediction of building damage due to ground subsidence produced by tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015. 50: p. 424-437. Da Silva, A.H.A., Pereira, E.M.V, Pita, G.L., Siqueira, G.H., Vieira, L.C.M., 2021. Damage estimation in reinforced concrete buildings from induced earthquakes in Brazil. Engineering Strucutres, Volume 234, 111904. Deck, O., 2002. Étude des conséquences des affaissements miniers sur le bâti: Propositions pour une méthodologie d'évaluation de la vulnérabilité du bâti. Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine. Diao, X., Bai, Zhihui, Wu, K., Zhou, D., and Li, Z., 2018. Assessment of mining-induced damage to structures using InSAR time series analysis: a case study of Jiulong Mine, China. Environmental Earth Sciences,77:166. Dzegniuk, B., Hejmanowski, R., and Sroka, A. “Evaluation of the damage hazard to building objects on the mining areas considering the deformation course in time”. Proceedings of Xth International Congress of the International Society for Mine Surveying, Fremantle, Western Australia, 1997. EN 1998-1, 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. 1st ed. Brussels: BSi. Gillian, R.F., Wilson, P.W., Gluyas, J.G., Julian, B.R., and Davies, R.J., 2018. Global review of human-induced earthquakes. Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 178, pages 438-514. Hejmanowski, R., Agnieszka, A., Malinowska, A., Witkowski, W.T., Guzy, A., 2019. An Analysis Applying InSAR of Subsidence Caused by Nearby Mining-Induced Earthquakes. Geosciences, 9, 490. Hejmanowski, R. and A. Malinowska, 2009. Evaluation of reliability of subsidence prediction based on spatial statistical analysis. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 2009. 46(2): p. 432-438. Malinowska, A., 2008. Fuzzy logic-based approach to building damage risk assessment considering the social and economic value. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, 2008. 24. Malinowska, A., 2013. Analysis of methods used for assessing damage risk of buildings under the influence of underground exploitation in the light of world´s experience – Part 1. Arch. Min. Sci., Vol. 58, No 3, p. 843–853. Malinowska, A. and R. Hejmanowski, 2010. Building damage risk assessment on mining terrains in Poland with GIS application. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010. 47(2): p. 238-245. Mine Subsidence Engineering Consultants (MCBE). “Mine Subsidence Damage to Building Structure”. 2007. Available at www.minesubsidence.com, last accessed on 2024/04/10. National Coal Board (NCB), 1975. Subsidence Engineer’s Handbook. London. Saeidi, A., O. Deck, and T. Verdel, 2008. Development of a simulator of damage for evaluation of the vulnerability of buildings in subsidence zones–case study: Joeuf city. in Post Mining conference. Saeidi, A., O. Deck, and T. Verdel, 2012. Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from analytical methods. Géotechnique, 62(2): p. 107-120. Saeidi, A., O. Deck, and T. Verdel, 2013. Comparison of building damage assessment methods for risk analysis in mining subsidence regions. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 31: p. 1073-1088. Skempton, A.W., MacDonald, D.H., 1956. The allowable settlements of buildings. Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 5(6): p.727-768. Verdoes, A., Boin, A., 2021. Earthquakes in Groningen: Organized Suppression of a Creeping Crisis. In: Boin, A., Ekengren, M., Rhinard, M. (eds) Understanding the Creeping Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70692-0_9 Worland, J., 2015. Human Activity Is Triggering More Earthquakes in the U.S. In Time, 23 Apr. 2015, https://time.com/3833398/human-activity earthquakes/. Accessed 2024-06-04.