PSI - Issue 64

Michele Matteoni et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 64 (2024) 2005–2012 Matteoni M., Pedone L., Francioli M., Petrini F., and Pampanin S./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

2012

8

Acknowledgements. This research is supported by the PNRR (Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza) funding scheme as part of the National Research Centre CN1 on "High-Performance Computing, Big Data and Quantum Computing" - Spoke 5 – “ Environment and Natural Disaster: Framework and methodologies for impact evaluation and risk mitigation ” . The authors acknowledge the financial support of PNRR-CN1-Spoke 5 for funding Mattia Francioli (RTD-A) and Michele Matteoni (PhD scholarship). Livio Pedone received funding (RTD-A) from the project “Centro di ricerca per l'innovazione sull'economia circolare e sulla salute” (CUP: J83C22000970001), within the “Rete per l’Innovazione e la Ricerca dell’area dal Sisma del 2009 e del 2016” framework , Sub misura B.4.1 “ Programma Unitario di intervento per le aree del terremoto del 2009 e 2016 ” - Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza/Fondo Complementare – Founded by the European Union - Next Generation EU. References ALA (American Lifeline Alliance). 2001. Seismic fragility formulation for water systems. Washington, DC: ALA. Alexoudi, M., Hatzigogos, Th., Pitilakis, K., Anastasiadis, A. 2004. Prioritization policy for seismic risk reduction of gas pipelines combining ground motion, vulnerability and socio-economic parameters. The case of Thessaloniki (Greece). Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering and 3d International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering: 581-589. Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Gehl, P., Khazai, B. 2012. Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41(11), 1569-1589. D'Ayala, D., Meslem, A., Vamvatsikos, D., Porter, K., Rossetto, T., Crowley, H., Silva, V. (2014). Guidelines for analytical vulnerability assessment of low/mid-rise buildings. Global Earthquake Model (GEM), Technical Report, Pavia, Italy. De Risi, R., Penna, A., Simonelli, A. L., 2019. Seismic risk at urban scale: the role of site response analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 123, 320-336. DM 65, 2017. Linee Guida per la Classificazione del Rischio Sismico delle Costruzioni. Italian Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports, Rome, Italy. (in Italian). Dolce, M., Prota, A., Borzi, B., da Porto, F., Lagomarsino, S., Magenes, G., et al., 2021. Seismic risk assessment of residential buildings in Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19, 2999-3032. Fragiadakis, M., and S. E. Christodoulou. 2014. Seismic reliability assessment of urban water networks. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (3): 357 – 374. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2348. Francioli, M., Petrini, F., and Bontempi F. 2023. Structural robustness analysis of RC frames under seismic and blast chained loads scenarios, Journ. Build. Eng., 67: 105970. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105970. Grunthal, G., 1998. European Macroseismic Scale. European Seismological Commission, Conseil de l’Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie: Luxembourg, Volume 15. Masi, A., Lagomarsino, S., Dolce, M., Manfredi, V., Ottonelli, D. 2021. Towards the updated Italian seismic risk assessment: exposure and vulnerability modelling. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19, 3253-3286. Matteoni, M., Pedone, L., Pampanin, S., 2024. Filling the knowledge gap: from seismic risk maps towards nationwide digital twins, 18th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Milan, Italy. (in press). Mazumder, R. K., Fan, X., Salman, A. M., Li Y., and Yu X. 2020. Framework for Seismic Damage and Renewal Cost Analysis of Buried Water Pipelines. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract., 2020, 11(4): 04020038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000487. Nair, G. S., S. R. Dash, and G. Mondal. 2018. Review of pipeline performance during earthquakes since 1906. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (6): 04018083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001214. NZSEE, 2017. The Seismic Assessment of Existing Building — Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessments, New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE), Wellington, New Zealand. O’Rourke, M., and G. Ayala. 1993. Pipeline damage due to wave propagation. J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (9): 1490– 1498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:9(1490). OPCM 3519, 2006. Criteri generali per l'individuazione delle zone sismiche e per la formazione e l'aggiornamento degli elenchi delle medesime zone. Ordinanza della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, 28 aprile 2006, in Gazzetta Ufficiale n.108 11/05/06, Rome, Italy. (in Italian). Pampanin, S., 2017. Towards the practical implementation of performance-based assessment and retrofit strategies for RC buildings: challenges and solutions, 4th SMAR conference, Keynote Lecture, Zürich, Switzerland. Pampanin, S., 2022. A step-change for seismic risk reduction (towards a) national plan for the integrated seismic-energetic rehabilitation of the building stock. Structural 242. (in Italian). Pedone, L., Bianchi, S., Giovinazzi, S., Pampanin, S., 2022. A framework and tool for knowledge-based seismic risk assessment of school buildings: SLaMA-School. Sustainability 14(16), 9982. ShakeMap Scientific Background. Rapid Instrumental Intensity Maps". Earthquake Hazards Program. U. S. Geological Survey. Stucchi, M., Meletti, C., Montaldo, V., Crowley, H., Calvi, G. M., Boschi, E. (2011). Seismic hazard assessment (2003 – 2009) for the Italian building code. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101(4), 1885-1911. Verderame, G. M., Stella, A., Cosenza, E. 2001. Le proprietà meccaniche degli acciai impiegati nelle strutture in ca realizzate negli anni ‘ 60, X Convegno nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Potenza -Matera, Italy.