PSI - Issue 64

Filippo Andreose et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 64 (2024) 40–47

47

8

Acknowledgments The study was supported by FABRE – “Research consortium for the evaluation and monitoring of bridges, viaducts and other structures” ( www.consorziofabre.it/en) within the activities of the FABRE-ANAS 2021-2024 research program. (a) (b) (c) (d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Fig. 10. Frequency tracking of subgroup 1 (a), 2 (b), 3 (c) and 4 (d). Control charts of subgroup 1(e), 2(f), 3 (g) and 4(h).

References

Bin ZF, Chao OZ, Yee KS, 2020. A review of operational modal analysis techniques for in-service modal identification. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42(8):1 – 18 Farrar CR, Worden K, 2012. Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. John Wiley & Sons, New York Fritzen CP, 2005. Vibration-based structural health monitoringconcepts and applications. Key Eng Mater 293:3 – 20 Fuentes R, Cross EJ, Gardner PA, Bull LA, Rogers TJ, Barthorpe RJ, Shi H, Dervilis N, Farrar CR, Worden K, 2020. Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Identification. Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics. Springer Nature, Berlin, pp 1 – 72 García-Macías E, Ubertini F, 2020. MOVA/MOSS: Ttwo integrated software solutions for comprehensive structural health monitoring of structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 143:106830 García-Macías, E., Ruccolo, A., Zanini, M.A., Pellegrino C., Gentile C., Ubertini F., Mannella P., 2023. P3P: a software suite for autonomous SHM of bridge networks. J Civil Struct Health Monit 13, 1577 – 1594). Gentile C, Saisi A, 2015. Continuous dynamic monitoring of a centenary iron bridge for structural modification assessment. Front Struct Civil Eng 9(1):26 – 41 ISIS Canada (2001) Guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring. pages 539 – 541. ISIS Canada Lon Wah Soo W, Chen YT, Roberts GW, Elamin A, 2018. Separating damage from environmental effects affecting civil structures for near real time damage detection. Struct Health Monit 17(4):850 – 868 Ministry of Infrastructure Decree no. 578, 2020. Enforcement of the Guidelines on risk classification and management, safety assessment and monitoring of existing bridges (in Italian: Adozione delle linee guida per la gestione del rischio dei ponti esistenti e per la definizione di requisiti ed indicazioni relativi al sistema di monitoraggio dinamico). Moreu F, Li X, Li S, Zhang D., 2018. Technical specifications of structural health monitoring for highway bridges: new Chinese structural health monitoring code. Front Built Environ 4:10. Peeters B, De Roeck G, 2001. One-year monitoring of the Z24 - Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(2):149 – 171 Saisi A, Gentile C, Guidobaldi M, 2015. Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua. Italy. Constr Build Mater 81:101 – 112 Ubertini F, Cavalagli N, Kita A, Comanducci G, 2018. Assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower after 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence by long-term SHM. B Earthq Eng 16(2):775 – 801 UNI/TR11634, 2016. Guidelines for the structural health monitoring (in Italian: Linee Guida per il monitoraggio strutturale).