PSI - Issue 8

Simonetta Boria et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 8 (2018) 102–117 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2017) 000 – 000

106

5

Table 1. Specimen details. Specimen

Diameter

Wall thickness

Trigger

Metal t m (mm)

Composite t c (mm)

Hybrid t h (mm)

Hole

Chamfer

Type

Nomenclature

D (mm)

AL_50_2_(1) AL_80_2_(4) AL_100_2_(7) PURE_50_2_(1) PURE_50_3_(2) PURE_50_4_(3) PURE_80_2_(4) PURE_80_3_(5) PURE_80_4_(6) PURE_100_2_(7) PURE_100_3_(8) PURE_100_4_(9) HYBRID_50_2_(1) HYBRID_50_3_(2) HYBRID_50_4_(3) HYBRID_80_2_(4) HYBRID_80_3_(5) HYBRID_80_4_(6) HYBRID_100_2_(7) HYBRID_100_3_(8) HYBRID_100_4_(9)

50 80

2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 6 4 5 6 4 5 6

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Aluminum

X X

100

50 50 50 80 80 80

- - - - - - - - - - - -

PURE

100 100 100

50 50 50 80 80 80

X X X X X X

HYBRID

100 100 100

X X X

Fig. 3. Hybrid specimen under quasi-static compression before (on the left) and after (on the right) the test.