PSI - Issue 44

Marco Gaetani d’Aragona et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 44 (2023) 1052–1059 M. Gaetani d’Aragona, M. Polese, A. Prota / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2022) 000–000

1059

8

Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2018b. The effect of alternative retrofit strategies on reduction of expected losses: evaluation with detailed and simplified approach, in Proceedings of Italian Concrete Days 2016, Springer; editors Di Prisco M. and Menegotto M., ISBN 978-3-319-78936-1, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78936-1_28. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Cosenza E., Prota A., 2019a. Simplified Assessment of Maximum Interstory Drift for RC Buildings with Irregular Infills Distribution Along the Height, Bull Earthquake Engineering; 17(2), 707-736. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0473-y. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2019b. Simplified model calibration for dynamic response assessment of infilled RC buildings. In: Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. Greece: Crete; June 2019. p. 24–6. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2020. Stick-IT: a simplified model for rapid estimation of IDR and PFA for existing low-rise symmetric infilled RC building typologies. Eng Struct; 223:111182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. engstruct.2020.111182. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2021a. The use of Stick-IT model for the prediction of direct economic losses. In: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics;. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3429. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2021b. Effect of Masonry Infill Constitutive Law on the Global Response of Infilled RC Buildings. Buildings; 11(2), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020057 Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2022a. Large scale loss assessment using stick-it model: A comparison with actual cost data, Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 160, 107363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107363 Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2022b. Stick model for as-built and retrofitted infilled RC frames, Engineering Structures, under review. Hak S., Morandi P., Magenes G., Sullivan T.J., 2012. Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures. J Earthq Eng;16(1):1–35. Jamsek A., Dolsek M., 2020. Seismic analysis of older and contemporary reinforced concrete frames with the improved fish-bone model. Eng Struct;212:110514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110514. Khaloo A.R., Khosravi H., 2013. Modified fish-bone model: a simplified MDOF model for simulation of seismic responses of moment resisting frames. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng; 55:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.013. Lu X., Han B., Hori M., Xiong C., Xu Z., 2014. A coarse-grained parallel approach for seismic damage simulations of urban areas based on refined models and GPU/CPU cooperative computing. Adv Eng Software;70:90–103. Lu X., Tian Y., Wang G., Huang D., 2018. A numerical coupling scheme for nonlinear time history analysis of buildings on a regional scale considering site-city interaction effects. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam ;47(13):2708–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ eqe.v47.1310.1002/eqe.3108. Luco N., Mori Y., Funahashi Y., Allin Cornell C., Nakashima M., 2003. Evaluation of predictors of non-linear seismic demands using ‘fishbone’ models of SMRF buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam; 32(14):2267–88. MAEviz. Earthquake risk assessment using MAEviz 2.0, a tutorial. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois. MATLAB. version 9.10 (R2021a). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2021. HAZUS-MH 2.1. Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology-Earthquake Model. Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. Pampanin S., Calvi G.M., and Moratti M., 2002. Seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints designed for gravity loads. Proc., 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (ECEE), London. Polese M., Verderame G.M., Manfredi G., 2009. Static vulnerability of existing RC buildings in Italy: A case study. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2009; 39: 599–620. Polese M., Gaetani d’Aragona M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2018. Sustainable selective mitigation interventions towards effective earthquake risk reduction at the community scale. Sustainability; 10, 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082894. Soleimani R., Khosravi H., Hamidi H, 2019. Substitute frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames. Eng Struct 2019;185:68–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.127. Tasligedik A.S., Akguzel U., Kam W.Y. and Pampanin S., 2016. Strength hierarchy at reinforced concrete beam-column joints and global capacity strength hierarchy at reinforced concrete Beam-Column joints and global capacity. Journal of Earthquake Engineering; 22(3): 454-487. Verderame G.M., Polese M., Mariniello C., Manfredi G., 2010. A simulated design procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Advances in Engineering Software; 41: 323-335. Verderame G.M., Polese M., Cosenza E., 2009. Vulnerability of existing R.C. buildings under gravity loads: A simplified approach for non-sway structures. Engineering Structures; 31(9): 2141-2151, ISSN 0141-0296, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.014 Xiong C., Lu X., Guan H., Xu Z., 2016. A nonlinear computational model for regional seismic simulation of tall buildings. Bull Earthq Eng; 14(4):1047–69. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10518-016-9880-0