PSI - Issue 37

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

ScienceDirect

Procedia Structural Integrity 37 (2022) 1043–1048

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of Pedro Miguel Guimaraes Pires Moreira Abstract The application of bonded CFRP on metallic bridge structural elements is a repair technique with great potential. The choice of the adhesive type plays a key role in the performance of the repair. Most previous researches utilized brittle adhesives specially developed for the concrete-CFRP bonding which does not provide the best performance for steel/CFRP joints. The recent high-strength ductile adhesives developed for the automotive industry to bond metallic and composite materials are more appropriate for CFRP/Steel joints. This paper compares the performance of brittle adhesive and ductile adhesive in CFRP/steel double strap joints subjected to tensile loading. The results revealed that the ductile adhesives achieve much higher performance than brittle ones. Digital image correlation (DIC) shows that specimens with ductile adhesive have a more uniform strain distribution compared to the brittle ones. © 2022 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 ) Peer-review under responsibility of Pedro Miguel Guimaraes Pires Moreira Keywords: CFRP, adhesive, CFRP, double strap joint e under the CC BY-NC ICSI 2021 The 4th International Conference on Structural Integrity Comparison between brittle and ductile adhesives in CFRP/steel joints Anis Mohabeddine a* , Ghassan Malik b , José Correia a , Nicholas Fantuzzi b , Abílio De Jesus c , José Miguel Castro a , Rui Calçada a , Filipo Berto d a Construct, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering University of Porto4200-465 Porto, Portugal. b Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bologna, Italy. c INEGI, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal . d Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway. Ani b b Jesus c , José Miguel Castro a

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +0-000-000-0000 ; fax: +0-000-000-0000 . E-mail address: amohabeddine@fe.up.pt

2452-3216 © 2022 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of Pedro Miguel Guimaraes Pires Moreira

2452-3216 © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of Pedro Miguel Guimaraes Pires Moreira 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.02.043