PSI - Issue 28

Giovanni Meneghetti et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 28 (2020) 1481–1502 Giovanni Meneghetti et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000

1484

4

F/2

F/2

w=40

t=10

w=40

F

F

ADI 1050

S355J2

ADI 1050

S355J2

2a ≈ 4

t=10

F/2

F/2

300

b≈15

300-2b

b≈15

A: partial-penetration butt-welded joints under axial loading

B1: full-penetration butt-welded joints under 4PB loading

F/2

F/2

w=40

t=8

w=40

F

F

ADI 1050

S355J2

ADI 1050

S355J2

t=8

F/2

F/2

300

b≈15

300-2b

b≈15

B2: full-penetration ground butt-joints under axial loading

B2: full-penetration ground butt-joints under 4PB loading

F/2

F/2

t=10

ADI 1050 S355J2 S355J2

F

w=40

F

w=40

ADI 1050

t=10

S355J2

F/2

F/2

300

300-2b

b≈15

b≈15

C: cruciform non-load-carrying fillet-welded joints under 4PB loading

D: T non-load-carrying fillet-welded joints under axial loading

F/2

F/2

F

w=40

F

t=10

S355J2 S355J2

S355J2 S355J2

t=10

w=40

ADI 1050

ADI 1050

ADI 1050

ADI 1050

F/2

F/2

300-2b

b≈15

300

b≈15

E: cruciform load-carrying fillet-welded joints under axial loading

F: cruciform full-penetration k-butt welded joints under 4PB loading

Figure 1: Geometries and loading conditions of dissimilar welded joints tested under fatigue loading.