PSI - Issue 2_A
Juan E Perez Ipiña et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 769–776 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000
771
3
b
1 B
2 ( ) K K K K 0( ) B Jc B
min( ) B
1 exp N
P
(3)
1
2
min( ) B
1
1
If B 2 specimens are tested, the corresponding failure probability, estimating the corresponding parameters, will be:
b
2 B
2 ( ) K K K K 0( ) B Jc B
min( ) B
1 exp
P
(4)
2
2
min( ) B
2
2
Working on Eqs. (2), (3) and (4), it is possible to predict the toughness and the K 0 parameter of B 2 specimens testing B 1 specimens, by means of Eqs. (5) and (6).
1
b
1 B 2 B
( 1 ) B
2 ( ) K K JC B
1 ( ) K K JC B
(5)
min( ) B
min( ) B
1
1
1
b
1 B 2 B
( 1 ) B
0( ) B K K
1 0( ) B K K
(6)
min( ) B
min( ) B
2
1
1
1.2. Master curve size conversion ASTM E1921-15a 1 (2015) sets up a procedure for K
0 determination. It includes calculating the values of K Jc , derived from Jc using Eq. (7), the conversion of these last values to 1-inch size equivalent, as well as specifications for data censoring.
. J E C
K
(7)
J
2
1
C
This standard imposes two limits for K Jc values: the first one is given by the condition of high crack-front constraint at fracture (Eq. (8)).
Eb
K
0
YS
(8)
max
J
2
30 1
The second limit states that K Jc values also shall be regarded as invalid for tests that terminate in cleavage after more than 0.05(W-a o ) or 1 mm (0.040 in.), whichever is smaller, of slow-stable crack growth. The obtained K Jc values for a B N thickness specimen must be converted to 1 inch equivalent by means of Eq. (5),
taking Kmin(B 2 ) = 20, b(B 2 ) =4 and B2 =1. K 0 is calculated by means of Eq. (9):
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease