PSI - Issue 2_A

H. Rolland et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 301–308 Rolland / Structur l Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000– 00

308 8

Fig. 8: Damage mechanism density evolution depending on specimen orientation

References

Thomason, J.L., 1999. The influence of fibre properties on the performance of glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6,6. Composites Science and Technology 59, 2315–2328. Thomason, J.L., 2008. The influence of fibre length, diameter and concentration on the modulus of glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6,6. Composites: Part A 39, 1732–1738. Horst, J.J., Spoormaker, J.L., 1996. Mechanisms of fatigue in short glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6. Polymer Engineering & Science 36, 2718–2726. Horst, J.J., Spoormaker, J.L., 1997. Fatigue fracture mechanisms and fractography of short-glassfibre-reinforced polyamide 6. Journal of materials science 32, 3641–3651. Kak, A., Slaney, M., 1988. Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE, New York. Barbouchi, S., Bellenger, V., Tcharkhtchi, A., Castaing, Ph., Jollivet, T., 2007. Effect of water on the fatigue behaviour of a pa66/glass fibers composite material. Journal of Materials Science 42, 2181–2188. Arif, M.F., Meraghni, F., Chemisky, Y., Despringre, N., Robert, G., 2014. In situ damage mechanisms investigation of pa66gf30 composite: effect of relative humidity. Composites: Part B 58, 487– 495. Bernasconi, A., Cosmi, F., Dreossi, D., 2008. Local anisotropy analysis of injection moulded fibre reinforced polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology 68, 2574 –2581. Rolland, H., Saintier, N., Robert, G., 2016. Damage mechanisms in short glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic during in situ microtomography tensile tests. Composites Part B: Engineering 90, 65-377.