PSI - Issue 16
Yuri Lapusta et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 16 (2019) 105–112 Yuri Lapusta, Oleksandr Andreikiv, Nataliya Yadzhak / Structural Integrity Procedia
109
5
1
v v
r E
t fc
2 K l fc fc p
2
2
max K l K l fc I I fc p
1 l
2
K
4
fc
l
2 K l (1 ) fc fc p fc R
*
N
dl
.
(9)
*
2
1 2
l
v v
0
r E
t fc
2
2
2 4 2 th fc p K l
max K l K l fc I I fc p
1 l
2
K
4
fc
3. Approbation of the model
Consider a special case, when the initial crack length 0 l is equal to zero. In this case, the computational models known in literature may give incorrect results, namely * subcr N . Based on the proposed model, the fracture process should start with the mechanism of crack initiation. Hence, the period of subcritical crack growth * subcr N consists of two components: the initiation period of a macrocrack i N and the period of its subcritical growth subcr N * subcr i subcr N N N . (10) Then the initiation period of a macrocrack i N can be determined by the relation (9) when 0 0 l . As an example of the application of the formula (9) for this case, its correctness and preciseness, we consider tension of a strip with two symmetrical stress risers with bending radii r subject to symmetrical loading p (Fig.2). The problem is to determine the number of load cycles N , when the plate fractures. To solve the problem the proposed formula (9) is applied. Considering a plate with two side stress risers, the stress intensity factors I K and max I K are determined by the formulas (Andreikiv et al. (2011)):
Fig. 2. Loading scheme of a plate with two stress risers.
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter creator