PSI - Issue 11

J.H.A. Rocha et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 11 (2018) 107–113

111

5

J.H.A. Rocha e

t al. / Structural I

ntegrity Procedi

a 00 (2018) 000–

000

Fig. 5. P1, P2 and

ambient temper

atures related to

relative humidity .

Fig. 6

. Thermal contra

st between P1 an

d P2.

Fig. 7. The

rmograms taken

b) 5:00 PM

at: (a) noon and (

It temp in a high dete envi

is important erature and m period betwee er than 1 ° C ctable therma ronment, whi

to note that oist area (P2 n 9:00 AM a , whereas fo l gradients ar ch is also repo

thermal gra ). In Fig. 8 th nd 2:00 PM, w r smaller va e produced w rted and reco

dients occur is difference hen the diffe lues, detectio hen there is m mmended by

when there is observed d rence betwee n was limite ore than 1 ° Barreira and

is a noticeab uring test tim n ambient tem d and inaccu C difference Freitas (2007

le difference e. This detec perature and rate. It can b between stu ).

between am tion occurred affected area e concluded died areas an

bient only was that d the