PSI - Issue 39
Paolo Livieri et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 39 (2022) 194–203 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
198
5
1 2 0 ∫ = π
2
π
π
1
2
π
0 ∫ = π
) ; cos( n d
) sin(
; α α
p n
q n
n d
ρ
α α
ρ
0 ∫
2 b 1 0 =
d ;
α ρ
(9 a, b, c)
π
the expression of K I becomes:
+
σ
[
]
∑ ≥ n 2
π 2 K ( ) 2 a 1 b α ≈ I
α cos(n ) q sin (n ) E p α + n n n
0
+
(10)
The asymptotic behaviour of E n and the hypothesis on R (and therefore on ρ) ensure the convergence of the series (10). Table 1. E n coefficients n E n n E n 0 ½ 6 -1.58042 1 0 7 -1.81911 2 -0.4 8 -2.04377 3 -0.74286 9 -2.2566 4 -1.04762 10 -2.45929 5 -1.32468 11 -2.65318 3. Propagation phase By means of Eq. (10), the stress intensity factors on the whole crack contour can be easily calculated provided that the b 0 , p i and q i coefficients are estimated. Now, in order to use Eq. (10) for the assessment of the propagation of an embedded crack, we consider a butt welded joint subjected to a fatigue loading with a nominal ratio equal to zero. The growth rate model is taken according to Paris’ model [19]: = C ∆ K (11) If ∆ K ≤ ∆ K th , the crack growth ratio da/dN is set to zero. Obviously, more complicated propagation models could be used in the future that take into account the closure effect or short crack [20,21,22]. In the specific case of welded joints according to Hobbacher [23], we consider the reference values of Table 2 for steel joints. In order to evaluate the final crack shape, as a first step, the stress intensity factors are calculated by means of Eq. (9) . In all analyses, we use half of the maximum diameter of the actual crack to obtain the non-dimensional radius ρ ( α ) in Eq. (9) (a=max diameter of crack / 2). Then, by using Eq. (11), the local crack growth da(α) is evaluated along the whole boundary and the new shape is carried out. The increment of da(α) is assumed according to the outward normal and the use of Eq. (8) simplifies the evaluation of the normal as a function of α .
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator