PSI - Issue 39
Fabrizio Greco et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 39 (2022) 638–648 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
641
4
Figure 1. (a) Representation of a regular brick masonry structure; (b) cohesive/volumetric finite element discretization at mortar joints: a schematic of brick/mortar and mortar/mortar interface elements and related notations.
where b C and m C are the elasticity tensors of brick and mortar continuous phases, respectively. Besides, U is the set of kinematically admissible displacement fields compatible with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions on D Γ , ε is the usual infinitesimal strain tensor. In Eq. (1), the third term of the left-hand side represents the interface contribution, in which int int int + − = = − t t t represents the interface traction exchanged across the brick/mortar and mortar/mortar interfaces, while − + = − u u u § ¨ indicates the displacement jump vector across these interfaces. The constitutive behavior of both brick/mortar and mortar/mortar interfaces is described trough a mixed-mode traction-separation cohesive law incorporating a nonlinear softening response. According to this model, cohesive tractions ( int t ) can be expressed in the following matrix form:
n s t t
n δ δ s
0
0
K
(
)
(2)
t
1 = = −
d
n
int
0
0
K
s
being 0 s K the normal and tangential stiffness components, and n δ = ⋅ u n § ¨ and s δ = ⋅ u s § ¨ the normal and tangential components of displacement jump vector, respectively. Besides, d represent a single scalar damage, which is described by means of the following linear-exponential evolution law: 0 n K and
max δ δ ≤ 0
0
for
m
m
max δ δ α δ δ − − 0 f m m m
0
1 exp
− −
m
0
δ
0 δ δ δ < ≤ max m m m f
1 = −
1
for
(3)
d
−
m
( ) α
max
1 exp
δ
− −
m
max δ δ >
f
1
for
m
m
0 m δ ,
max m δ , which are special values of the mixed-mode separation displacement m δ
f m δ , and
Note that d depends on
, defined as:
2
(4)
2
δ
=
δ δ +
m
n
s
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator