PSI - Issue 8
Simonetta Boria et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 8 (2018) 102–117 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2017) 000 – 000
106
5
Table 1. Specimen details. Specimen
Diameter
Wall thickness
Trigger
Metal t m (mm)
Composite t c (mm)
Hybrid t h (mm)
Hole
Chamfer
Type
Nomenclature
D (mm)
AL_50_2_(1) AL_80_2_(4) AL_100_2_(7) PURE_50_2_(1) PURE_50_3_(2) PURE_50_4_(3) PURE_80_2_(4) PURE_80_3_(5) PURE_80_4_(6) PURE_100_2_(7) PURE_100_3_(8) PURE_100_4_(9) HYBRID_50_2_(1) HYBRID_50_3_(2) HYBRID_50_4_(3) HYBRID_80_2_(4) HYBRID_80_3_(5) HYBRID_80_4_(6) HYBRID_100_2_(7) HYBRID_100_3_(8) HYBRID_100_4_(9)
50 80
2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0 0 0 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 6 4 5 6 4 5 6
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Aluminum
X X
100
50 50 50 80 80 80
- - - - - - - - - - - -
PURE
100 100 100
50 50 50 80 80 80
X X X X X X
HYBRID
100 100 100
X X X
Fig. 3. Hybrid specimen under quasi-static compression before (on the left) and after (on the right) the test.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker