PSI - Issue 8
Gianluca Chiappini et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 8 (2018) 618–627 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2017) 000 – 000
624
7
3. Results
Table 2 shows the values of the breaking strength obtained with the 4 FEM models and the experimental tests, whereas Fig. 9 shows the map of the safety factor compared with the breaks obtained in the experimental tests.
Table 2. Force Comparison.
Experimental
FEM model
1600.90 2608.70 1855.40 1676.10
2000 2600 2040 2800
Load position F1 Load position F2 Load position F3 Load position F4
FEM Safety Factor
Experimental Fracture
Load Condition
F1
F2
F3
F4
Fig. 9. Confront FEM – sperimentale: coefficient di sicurezza e modi di rottura sperimentali.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker