PSI - Issue 75
Benjamin Causse et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 75 (2025) 205–218 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia (2025)
209 5
2.2. Angle variation We propose to study the influence on the service life of a variation in the load angle of the main directions during a cycle, the other loading parameters being constant and such that : σ I (t) = m + R sin t and II =0. Since the Eurocode does not take this variation in loading angle into account, the Eurocode calculation will be the reference for a zero variation in loading angle ( =) . To be able to compare the two methods, we apply 2 successive events: a first event for =0°, and a second event for pour = max varying from 0° to 90° in steps of 5°. For each event, we apply 2 harmonic cycles in R=0 ranging from 0 to 200 MPa (σI(t) = m + R sin ( t) and II =0 with m = R =100 MPa). Dang Van can then be used to calculate the lifetime N DV =f( ). The service life obtained for each value of is compared with that of the Eurocodes N E =N DV ( =0). The N DV lifetimes according to the Dang Van criterion are obtained as a function of the maximum load angle rotation during the cycle noted max , varying from 0° to 90°, according to the following load path scenarios (examples with a step max of 5°):
max = 0° : Harmonic oscillation from 0 to 200 MPa for = 0° Assessment of the number of cycles N E (typical Eurocode service life reference).
•
max = 5° : Harmonic oscillation from 0 to 200 MPa for = 0° Harmonic oscillation from 0 to 200 MPa for = 5° Assessment of the number of cycles N DV (according to Dang Van) max = x° : Harmonic oscillation from 0 to 200 MPa for = 0° Harmonic oscillation from 0 to 200 MPa for = x° Assessment of the number of cycles N DV (according to Dang Van)
•
•
Figure 1 shows an example of stress tensor for max max =30°.
Fig. 1. Loading angle variation study hypothesis (a) Calculation parameters and studied scenario (b) Example of stress tensor input for max =30°
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker