PSI - Issue 75

Mattias Clarin et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 75 (2025) 467–473 Clarin et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2025) 000 – 000

473

7

Acknowledgements 189 The authors would like to acknowledge Glenn Hedström, Markus Roos and Viktor Granström för fabricating the 190 test specimens as well as Michael Konrad and Sebastian Arvidsson for carrying out the fatigue testing. All working 191 at SSAB. 192 Funding 193 SSAB financially supported the research. Their support is gratefully acknowledged. 194 References 195 [1] Gadallah, R., & Shibahara, M. (2024). Investigating the effects of steel strength and tensile overload level on 196 fatigue crack growth performance . Engineering Fracture Mechanics 306, 110218. 197 [2] Heyraud, H. et al. (2023). Experimental characterisation and numerical modeling of the influence of a proof load 198 on the fatigue resistance of welded structures . International Journal of Fatigue 172, 107604. 199 [3] Huther, I. et al. (2022). Influence of overload on fatigue behaviour of longitudinal non-load-carrying welded joints . 200 Procedia Structural Integrity 38, 466 – 476. 201 [4] Khurshid, M. et al. (2014). Behavior of compressive residual stresses in high strength steel welds induced by HFMI 202 treatment . Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology,Vol. 136 / 041404-1. 203 [5] Grönlund, K. et al. (2024). Overload and variable amplitude load effects on the fatigue strength of welded joints . 204 Welding in the World, 68:411 – 425. 205 [6] SSAB (2012). Design Handbook – Structural Design and Manufacturing in High-Strength Steel , Edition 1.

206 207 208