PSI - Issue 72

Muhammad Daffa Alifianto et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 72 (2025) 392 – 400

398

(d) (e) Figure 10. Von-Mises stress contour of mild steel with mesh 11 mm: (a) 0.0001 s, (b) 0.0002 s, (c) 0.0003 s, (d) 0.0004 s, and (e) 0.0005 s.

(c)

(b)

(a)

(d) (e) Figure 11. Von-Mises stress contour of mild steel with mesh 13 mm: (a) 0.0001 s, (b) 0.0002 s, (c) 0.0003 s, (d) 0.0004 s, and (e) 0.0005 s.

(b)

(a)

(c)

(d) (e) Figure 12. Von-Mises stress contour of mild steel with mesh 15 mm: (a) 0.0001 s, (b) 0.0002 s, (c) 0.0003 s, (d) 0.0004 s, and (e) 0.0005 s. From the results shown, it can be seen that there is a difference between the mesh variations shown from the texture shown with the displacement or force results. When viewed from the texture results, the smaller the mesh used, the more detailed the damaged texture, as shown in Figure 5, and the larger the mesh used, the less detailed the damaged texture results, as in Figure 12. Therefore, an efficient mesh is needed to obtain detailed and appropriate results by comparing the simulation time and the results shown in each mesh variation.