PSI - Issue 70

Pradeep Ushakumari Abhinand et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 70 (2025) 129–136

136

ASCE/SEI 7-22. (2022). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415788 Asgarian, B., & Shokrgozar, H.R. (2009). BRBF response modification factor. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 290 – 298. Balendra, T., & Huang, X. (2003). Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS5950. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(8), 1019 – 1035. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2007). IS 800: General Construction in Steel – Code of Practice. New Delhi. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). IS 1893 (Part 1): Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures – Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings. New Delhi. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2023). IS 18168: Earthquake Resistant Design and Detailing of Steel Buildings – Code of Practice. New Delhi. Databases Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/databases Elnashai, A.S., & Mwafy, A.M. (2002). Overstrength and force reduction factors of multi-storey reinforced concrete buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 11, 329 – 351. FEMA P695. (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. Ferraioli, M., Lavino, A., & Mandara, A. (2014). Behaviour factor of code-designed steel moment resisting frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14(2), 243 – 254. Hassan, M.M. (2022). State of the art review: reduction factor for traditional steel moment resisting, braced, or eccentrically braced systems. Structures, 35, 734 – 747. Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A., & Krawinkler, H. (2005). Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(12), 1489 – 1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495. ICC. (2021). IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, Volume 4: Examples for Steel-Framed Buildings. https://shop.iccsafe.org/2021-ibcr structural-seismic-design-manual-volume-4-examples-for-steel-framed-buildings.html Jagruthi, N., Sharathchandran, K., Pandikkadavath, M.S., et al. (2023). Machine learning-based seismic drift response estimation of buckling restrained braced frames. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 837 – 848. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1604-7_63 Jasir, T.M., Pandikkadavath, M.S., & Navvar, K.M. (2023). Seismic response evaluation of irregular 6-storey buckling restrained braced frame. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4559326 Kalapodis, N.A., Papagiannopoulos, G.A., & Beskos, D.E. (2018). Modal strength reduction factors for seismic design of plane steel braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 147, 549 – 563. Kappos, A.J. (1999). Evaluation of behavior factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies. Engineering Structures, 21, 823 – 835. Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2005). Response modification factors of chevron braced frames. Engineering Structures, 27, 285 – 300. Kottalage, B.J., Pandikkadavath, M.S., & Mangalathu, S. (2022). Influence of bay span length on near-field seismic response of steel moment resisting frames. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 623 – 633. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3371-4_53 Krawinkler, H, Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames, Engineering Journal.,15(3)(1978), pp.82 91, 10.62913/engj.v15i3.318. Lignos, D.G., & Krawinkler, H. (2010). Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(11), 1291 – 1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376. Maheri, M.R., & Akbari, R. (2003). Seismic behavior factor, R for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 25(15), 1503 – 1513. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., & Fenves, G.L. (2006). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees): Command Language Manual. https://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual/OpenSeesCommandLanguageManualJune2006.pdf Mwafy, A.M., & Elnashai, A.S. (2002). Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 6(2), 239 – 273. Navvar, K.M., & Pandikkadavath, M.S. (2023). Seismic response modification factors evaluation of a 4-storey buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF). Materials Today: Proceedings. Pandikkadavath, M.S., & Sahoo, D.R. (2016). Analytical investigation on cyclic response of buckling-restrained braces with short yielding core segments. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(4), 1273 – 1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-0083-y Pandikkadavath, M.S., & Sahoo, D.R. (2016). Cyclic testing of short-length buckling-restrained braces with detachable casings. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(3), 699 – 716. Pandikkadavath, M.S., & Sahoo, D.R. (2017). Mitigation of seismic drift response of braced frames using short yielding-core BRBs. Steel and Composite Structures, 23(3), 285 – 302. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.3.285 Pandikkadavath, M.S., & Sahoo, D.R. (2019). Development and subassemblage cyclic testing of hybrid buckling-restrained steel braces. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 19(4), 967 – 983. Pandikkadavath, M.S., Shaijal, K.M., Mangalathu, S., & Davis, R. (2022). Seismic robustness assessment of steel moment resisting frames employing material uncertainty incorporated incremental dynamic analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 191, Article 107200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107200 Shaijal, K.M., Pandikkadavath, M.S., Mangalathu, S., & Davis, R. (2022). Material uncertainty based seismic robustness assessment of steel moment-resisting frames. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 485 – 494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7397-9_35 Uang, C.M. (1991). Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 117(1), 19 – 28. Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C.A. (2001). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491 – 514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.