PSI - Issue 7
Stanislav Žák et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 7 (2017) 254 – 261 Stanislav Žák et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (201 7 ) 000 – 000
258
5
Angle α is obviously a function of position along the precrack front. However, the maximal kink angle α m can be evaluated from the angle β and precrack characteristic dimensions: ( ) 1 m m tan tan 2 d a β α − ⋅ = ⋅ ∆ . (2)
Fig. 3. Simplified model of tortuous crack geometry
Let us now assume the stress tensor T σ components around the crack front (Anderson (1995)) for the remote mode II loading (smooth long crack, plane strain conditions, Poisson’s ratio ν ) and normalized to external loading and overall crack geometry:
2 α
3 cos 2 2 α α ⋅
sin
2 cos +
,
σ
= −
⋅
xx
3 cos cos 2 2 2 α α α ⋅ ⋅
sin
,
σ
=
yy
α
(3)
2 sin , 2 ν
σ
= − ⋅ ⋅
zz
2 α
3 sin 2 2 α α ⋅
cos
1 sin
,
xy σ σ σ =
⋅ −
0.
= =
xz
yz
To obtain the tensor T σ
* associated with the kinked and twisted facets of the tortuous crack front, the transformation
of the tensor T σ to the new coordinate system, related to elements of the inclined facet, leads to:
T σ ∗ = ⋅ ⋅ T L T L , σ
(4)
where L is matrix of direction cosines for double rotation of tensor coordinate system:
( ) ( ) α α
( ) α
cos sin
sin
0 0
−
1 0 0 cos 0 sin
0
( ) α
( ) ( ) β β
( ) β
x z L L L = ⋅
sin
cos
.
(5)
=
−
⋅
( ) β
0
0 1
cos
From equations (3) - (5) the normalized stress intensity factors can be derived as components of transformed tensor T σ * :
∗
T
I k K k K k K II II III / / /
,
≈
2,2
σ
∗
T
(6)
≈
,
II
1,2
σ
∗
T
.
≈
II
2,3
σ
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker