PSI - Issue 60

First page Table of contents Previous page 486 Next page Last page

ScienceDirect StructuralIntegrity Procedia 00 (2023) 000 – 000 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com StructuralIntegrity Procedia 00 (2023) 000 – 000 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect ScienceDirect

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

Procedia Structural Integrity 60 (2024) 484–493

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the ICONS 2023 Organizers © 2024 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the ICONS 2023 Organizers Abstract Elbows are critical parts of any piping system used in nuclear power plant industry. These elbows experience internal pressure and also undergoes in-plane bending due to external loading. In the present study, limit load for two types of elbows, viz., healthy elbow and elbow having circumferential through-wall notch at intrados, with and without internal pressure subjected to in-plane bending moment is determined. Limit load is dependent on the parameters, namely, thickness, mean radius, bent radius, internal pressure, yield stress, notch size and deformed diameter of the elbow. Based on the experimental and numerical studies, the expressions for limit load evaluation were proposed by various researchers. In the present study, the limit load evaluation expressions proposed by Chattopadhyay and Tomar (2006), Chang-Sik and Kim (2006) and Hong et al. (2010) are considered. The general approach followed is to arrive at a weakening factor for considering the effects of bend geometry, internal pressure and presence of notch. Limit load obtained by using the above expressions have been compared with the twice elastic slope (TES) method and experimental measured maximum load (EMML) values. For elbows without any defect, limit load of TES method are about one-third approximately compared to EMML values. But for elbows with defect, it is lesser than EMML values by 20%. Predicted limit load for healthy elbows with and without internal pressure using the different expressions, found to vary less than 10% compared to TES method. For the elbows with circumferential through-wall crack at intrados without internal pressure, limit load obtained using TES method is around 15% more compared to the values obtained using the expressions. © 2024 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the ICONS 2023 Organizers Third International Conference on Structural Integrity 2023 (ICONS 2023) Limit load evaluation for healthy elbows and elbows with notch at intrados under in-plane bending moment Thondamon V a *, S. Vishnuvardhan a , M. Saravanan a , A. Ramachandra Murthy a , S. Parivallal a a CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai 600 113, India Abstract Elbows are critical parts of any piping system used in nuclear power plant industry. These elbows experience internal pressure and also undergoes in-plane bending due to external loading. In the present study, limit load for two types of elbows, viz., healthy elbow and elbow having circumferential through-wall notch at intrados, with and without internal pressure subjected to in-plane bending moment is determined. Limit load is dependent on the parameters, namely, thickness, mean radius, bent radius, internal pressure, yield stress, notch size and deformed diameter of the elbow. Based on the experimental and numerical studies, the expressions for limit load evaluation were proposed by various researchers. In the present study, the limit load evaluation expressions proposed by Chattopadhyay and Tomar (2006), Chang-Sik and Kim (2006) and Hong et al. (2010) are considered. The general approach followed is to arrive at a weakening factor for considering the effects of bend geometry, internal pressure and presence of notch. Limit load obtained by using the above expressions have been compared with the twice elastic slope (TES) method and experimental measured maximum load (EMML) values. For elbows without any defect, limit load of TES method are about one-third approximately compared to EMML values. But for elbows with defect, it is lesser than EMML values by 20%. Predicted limit load for healthy elbows with and without internal pressure using the different expressions, found to vary less than 10% compared to TES method. For the elbows with circumferential through-wall crack at intrados without internal pressure, limit load obtained using TES method is around 15% more compared to the values obtained using the expressions. Third International Conference on Structural Integrity 2023 (ICONS 2023) Limit load evaluation for healthy elbows and elbows with notch at intrados under in-plane bending moment Thondamon V a *, S. Vishnuvardhan a , M. Saravanan a , A. Ramachandra Murthy a , S. Parivallal a a CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai 600 113, India Keywords: Elbow; Circumferential through-wall crack; Internal pressure; Limit load; TES method; Empirical expressions

Keywords: Elbow; Circumferential through-wall crack; Internal pressure; Limit load; TES method; Empirical expressions

2452-3216© 2024 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the ICONS 2023 Organizers 2452-3216© 2024 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the ICONS 2023 Organizers

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog