PSI - Issue 60
481 11
B Shashank Dutt et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 60 (2024) 471–483 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
Table 7 : Estimated K 1c results of austenitic stainless steel welds tested at 320 °C (Hong et al. 2018)
Weld and aging condition (°C)
Yield strength (MPa)
Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)
Total elongation (%)
Estimated K 1c ( MPa. m 0.5 )
Determined K j1c ( MPa. m 0.5 )
Percentage difference (%)
Estimated Modulus of toughness (MJ.m -3 )
E 308 as weld
300
440
30
215
178
21
111
Aged at 400, 5k h Aged at 400, 10k h E 316 L as weld Aged at 400, 5k h Aged at 400, 10k h E 347 as weld Aged at 400, 5k h Aged at 400, 10k h
305
450
25
199
152
31
94
305
450
20
178
139
28
76
330
440
25
200
240
16
96
360
510
20
191
179
6
87
362
520
18
182
175
4
79
370
480
22
198
262
25
94
520
530
15
181
240
24
79
420
520
17
183
245
26
80
Table 8 : Estimated K 1c results of cast stainless steel welds tested at RT (Yu et al. 2018)
Welding type and location
Yield strength (MPa)
Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)
Total elongation (%)
Estimated K 1c ( MPa.m 0.5 )
Determined K j1c ( MPa. m 0.5 )
Percentage difference (%)
Estimated Modulus of toughness (MJ.m -3 )
GTAW weld
462
590
32
272
350
22
168
Fusion zone of GTAW weld Heat affected zone of GTAW weld SMAW weld Fusion zone of SMAW weld Heat affected zone of SMAW weld
439
563
20
210
266
21
100
440
582
26
239
389
39
130
418
531
35
270
247
9
166
410
559
28
242
197
23
133
420
566
32
263
442
40
158
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog