PSI - Issue 57

Philipp Ladendorf et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 57 (2024) 589–597 Ladendorf, Herion, Winkler, Dürr / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

591

3

Table 1. Cross section geometries [mm]

* Experiment

RHS No.

b 0

t 0 8

b i

t i 4 8 4 8

g

e

β

2γ

τ

e/b 0

1 2 3 4 5

200

80

40 50 25 25 40

-23 -29

0.40 25 0.50 -0.12 0.40 20 0.64 -0.12 0.80 17 0.67 0.19 0.63 16 0.80 0.02 0.67 15 1.00 0.04

250 12.5 100

100 160 300

6

80

19

10 20

100

3

200 20

11

CHS No.

d 0

t 0

d i

t i

g

e

β

2γ

τ

e/d 0

1 323.9 20 244.5 20 2 193.7 10 114.3 6,3

40 20

31

0.75 16 1.00 0.11

-4 0.59 19 0.63 -0.02 3 101.6 6.3 70.0 5.0 25 (42)* 11 (19)* 0.69 16 0.79 0.10

2.2.2. Gusset-plate geometries The most important gusset-plate geometry-parameters are exemplarily shown for variant 1 in Fig. 2 and the corre sponding dimensions in Millimeters in Table 2 for all variants. Parameters describing the exact geometry can be found in the final report of the research project FOSTA P1442.

Fig. 2. Gusset-plate variant 1 with length l B , height h B and diameter of a stress-relief-hole d B,H

Table 2: Gusset-plate geometries [mm]

l B

h B

d B,H

RHS No.

t B

Var. 1 Var. 2/3

Var. 1

Var. 2/3

Var. 1

1 2 3 4 5

450 600 450 600

450 600 450 600 980

135 178 135 178 315

150 200 150 200 315

6.0 8.0 6.0 8.0

30 40 30 40 80

1200

20

h B

CHS No.

l B

t B

Var. 1 Var. 2 Var. 3

1 2 3

1483

404 260 120

404 200 128

404 200 115

20 10

742 445

6.0