PSI - Issue 52
Tomislav Polančec et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 52 (2024) 348 – 355 Tomislav Polančec, Tomislav Lesičar, Jakov Rako / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
350
3
t
prescribed surface force vector
UMAT XFEM
user-material
u
displacement field
extended finite element method
Greek α
backstress tensor
decrease rate of kinematic hardening
k
strain tensor
p ekv
equivalent plastic strain
,
Láme constants
poisson ratio
phase-field parameter
H
history field
energy density accumulation variable material dependent fatigue parameter
c e p
specific fracture energy elastic strain-energy density plastic strain-energy density
free energy functional of the body
σ
Cauchy stress tensor initial yield stress n -dimensional body
0 y
2. The phase-field method As mentioned in the introduction, problem of tracking complex crack paths in PFM is facilitated by the diffusive band whose width is controlled by the length scale parameter l . PFM relies on the calculation of the PF variable, which gives smooth transition from fully intact ( ) 0 = to fully deteriorated material ( ) 1 = [23]. Within this paper, small strain theory, elastoplastic constitutive behaviour and brittle fracture is assumed. Therefore, the PF problem as a minimization of the internal energy potential for a body is defined as follows [22]: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 e p e p e e p e c , , d 2 d . g l + − = + + + + (1) e and p denote elastic and plastic strain tensors, while ( ) g is the quadratic degradation function which deteriorates the material stiffness ( ) ( ) 2 1 g = − [26]. c represents the energetic threshold as a constant specific fracture energy, characteristic to the threshold (TH) model. c G represents the critical value of the fracture energy density [12]. To ensure physical consistency, it is assumed that crack propagates only in the tensile loading state. Hence, the volumetric-deviatoric composition proposed in [27] is used. Accordingly, a decomposition of the elastic deformation energy ( ) ( ) ( ) e e e e e e + − = + is implemented. The internal energy potential in tensile state is e p e p ( ) ( ) ( ) + + = + , while in the compressive state is e e ( ) ( ) − − = . After derivation procedure described in many references, such as [22], the obtained governing set of equations is: in , + = σ b 0 (2) on , = t σ n t (3) on , = u u u (4) 2 1 in , l − + + = H H (5) 0 on . = n (6)
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker