PSI - Issue 5
Patrícia C. Raposo et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 5 (2017) 1147–1152 Raposo et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2017) 000 – 000
1149
3
already inspected with the use of hammer. A total of 4 tests were carried out with this apparatus, in the locations presented in Fig. 2 (a) along the floor beams. The results show that exists in some cases surface degradations and internal degradations of the wood. In Fig. 2 (b) is showed the example of a test in a beam. In the Fig. 3 to Fig. 6 are presented the resistograph graphics obtained for the 4 pavement beams tested.
. MATERIAIS
Viga VC06_Ø17
- Pavimento Térreo
Viga VC01_Ø17
- VMa-Vigas Madeira (8x10cm2) - Alvenaria de Pedra | Pilares de Pedra
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
Topo Pavimento + 1.88
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
Viga VC02_Ø17
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VP01_Ø30
VMa_8x10cm2
- Vp-Vigas Madeira |Secções: Secções: (Ø14,Ø17,Ø30,Ø32,Ø35) Soalho:e=0.02m - VMac-Vigas Madeira (7x10cm2//0.60m)
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
Viga VP02_Ø30
Topo Cobertura + 5.54
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
- Vara (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VP04_Ø30
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC07_Ø17
ENSAIO R07 R4
VMa_8x10cm2 Vigas VP_Ø30//1.70 Vigas VP_Ø30//1.80 VMa_8x10cm2
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC03_Ø17
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VP03_Ø30
PERNA VP05_Ø30
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
Lajes de Pedra
VMa_8x10cm2
existente a manter
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC04_Ø17
VMa_8x10cm2
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VP05_Ø30
Vigas VP_Ø30//2.25 Vigas VP_Ø30//2.55 Vigas VP_Ø30//2.25 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 ENSAIO R05
VMa_8x10cm2
ENSAIO R06
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC05_Ø17
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
R3
VMa_8x10cm2
PERNA VP05_Ø30
Viga VP07_Ø30 VMa_8x10cm2 ENSAIO R03
Viga VP06_Ø30
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
Viga VP08_Ø30
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
Viga VP09_Ø30
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
ENSAIO R04
VMa_8x10cm2
Topo Cobertura + 6.83
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC08_Ø17
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
R1
VMa_8x10cm2
Vigas VP_Ø30|Ø32//3.75
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
Viga VC08_Ø17
ENSAIO R01
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC09_Ø17
VARA (6x6cm2)
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VP10_Ø30
VMac_7x10cm2//0.60
VMa_8x10cm2
VMa_8x10cm2
R2
VMa_8x10cm2
Viga VC10_Ø17
ENSAIO R02
Viga VP11_Ø32
Viga VP12_Ø35
(b)
VMa_8x10cm2
VARA (6x6cm2)
VARA (6x6cm2)
(a)
VARA (6x6cm2)
Fig. 2. (a) Location of the points where the tests were carried out with the resitograph; (b) Structural plant of ground floor; (b) Resistograph testing (images from: [9]). PLANTA ESTRUTURAL DO PISO 0 PLANTA ESTRUTURAL DA COBERTURA
The beam R1 results, next to the support, are presented in Fig. 3, being possible to verify that the beam is in food state of conservation and without apparent degradation, showing only a superficial degradation in the surface as it is possible to verify in the abscissa axis when the needle crossed the piece at 5 cm. It is also possible to see the total cross section dimension of the beam, in this case is around 33 cm.
Fig. 3. Obtained graphic of the R1 beam of the pavement, through resistograph (image from: [9]).
Fig. 4 show the graphic results for the beam R2, near the support delivery on the wall, displaying that this wood element was in poor state of preservation. It has a cross-section with constant deterioration, reaching the maximum resistance at approximately 6 cm of profundity. The deterioration in this beam should be associated with the high humidity content present, that lead to rotting. The beam cross section is about 24.5 cm.
Fig. 4. Obtained graphic of the R2 beam of the pavement, through resistograph (image from: [9]).
Fig. 5 presents the graphic results obtained for the R3 beam next to the support delivery in the wall. As the R2 beam this one, by visual inspection was detected humidity, which is according to the results obtained in the resistograph that showed a degraded cross-section, probably due rotting. The maximum resistance occurs at approximately 5.5 cm probably due to existence of a knot. The cross section of the beam is about 25 cm.
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs