PSI - Issue 5

Patrícia C. Raposo et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 5 (2017) 1147–1152 Raposo et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2017) 000 – 000

1149

3

already inspected with the use of hammer. A total of 4 tests were carried out with this apparatus, in the locations presented in Fig. 2 (a) along the floor beams. The results show that exists in some cases surface degradations and internal degradations of the wood. In Fig. 2 (b) is showed the example of a test in a beam. In the Fig. 3 to Fig. 6 are presented the resistograph graphics obtained for the 4 pavement beams tested.

. MATERIAIS

Viga VC06_Ø17

- Pavimento Térreo

Viga VC01_Ø17

- VMa-Vigas Madeira (8x10cm2) - Alvenaria de Pedra | Pilares de Pedra

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

Topo Pavimento + 1.88

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

Viga VC02_Ø17

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VP01_Ø30

VMa_8x10cm2

- Vp-Vigas Madeira |Secções: Secções: (Ø14,Ø17,Ø30,Ø32,Ø35) Soalho:e=0.02m - VMac-Vigas Madeira (7x10cm2//0.60m)

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

Viga VP02_Ø30

Topo Cobertura + 5.54

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

- Vara (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VP04_Ø30

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC07_Ø17

ENSAIO R07 R4

VMa_8x10cm2 Vigas VP_Ø30//1.70 Vigas VP_Ø30//1.80 VMa_8x10cm2

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC03_Ø17

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VP03_Ø30

PERNA VP05_Ø30

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

Lajes de Pedra

VMa_8x10cm2

existente a manter

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC04_Ø17

VMa_8x10cm2

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VP05_Ø30

Vigas VP_Ø30//2.25 Vigas VP_Ø30//2.55 Vigas VP_Ø30//2.25 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 VMa_8x10cm2 ENSAIO R05

VMa_8x10cm2

ENSAIO R06

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC05_Ø17

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

R3

VMa_8x10cm2

PERNA VP05_Ø30

Viga VP07_Ø30 VMa_8x10cm2 ENSAIO R03

Viga VP06_Ø30

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

Viga VP08_Ø30

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

Viga VP09_Ø30

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

ENSAIO R04

VMa_8x10cm2

Topo Cobertura + 6.83

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC08_Ø17

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

R1

VMa_8x10cm2

Vigas VP_Ø30|Ø32//3.75

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

Viga VC08_Ø17

ENSAIO R01

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC09_Ø17

VARA (6x6cm2)

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VP10_Ø30

VMac_7x10cm2//0.60

VMa_8x10cm2

VMa_8x10cm2

R2

VMa_8x10cm2

Viga VC10_Ø17

ENSAIO R02

Viga VP11_Ø32

Viga VP12_Ø35

(b)

VMa_8x10cm2

VARA (6x6cm2)

VARA (6x6cm2)

(a)

VARA (6x6cm2)

Fig. 2. (a) Location of the points where the tests were carried out with the resitograph; (b) Structural plant of ground floor; (b) Resistograph testing (images from: [9]). PLANTA ESTRUTURAL DO PISO 0 PLANTA ESTRUTURAL DA COBERTURA

The beam R1 results, next to the support, are presented in Fig. 3, being possible to verify that the beam is in food state of conservation and without apparent degradation, showing only a superficial degradation in the surface as it is possible to verify in the abscissa axis when the needle crossed the piece at 5 cm. It is also possible to see the total cross section dimension of the beam, in this case is around 33 cm.

Fig. 3. Obtained graphic of the R1 beam of the pavement, through resistograph (image from: [9]).

Fig. 4 show the graphic results for the beam R2, near the support delivery on the wall, displaying that this wood element was in poor state of preservation. It has a cross-section with constant deterioration, reaching the maximum resistance at approximately 6 cm of profundity. The deterioration in this beam should be associated with the high humidity content present, that lead to rotting. The beam cross section is about 24.5 cm.

Fig. 4. Obtained graphic of the R2 beam of the pavement, through resistograph (image from: [9]).

Fig. 5 presents the graphic results obtained for the R3 beam next to the support delivery in the wall. As the R2 beam this one, by visual inspection was detected humidity, which is according to the results obtained in the resistograph that showed a degraded cross-section, probably due rotting. The maximum resistance occurs at approximately 5.5 cm probably due to existence of a knot. The cross section of the beam is about 25 cm.

Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs