PSI - Issue 44

Alessandra Gubana et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 44 (2023) 512–519

519

8

A. Gubana and A. Mazelli / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2022) 000–000

period due to the shear behaviour of the star/lift cores is too relevant, and the spectral acceleration showed to be not a representative intensity measure for this case study. References Angiolilli, M., Lagomarsino, S., Cattari, S., Degli Abbati, S., 2021. Seismic fragility assessment of existing masonry buildings in aggregate. Eng Struct; vol. 247, art. no. 113218. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113218 Biskinis, D.E., Roupakias, G.K., Fardis, M.N., 2004. Degradation of Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members with Inelastic Cyclic Displacements , ACI Structural Journal, vol. 101, n. 6, Nov.-Dec., 2004, 773-783. Borzi, B., Onida, M., Faravelli, M., Polli, D., Pagano, M., Quaroni, D. et al., 2021. IRMA platform for the calculation of damages and risks of residential buildings. Bull Earthq Eng; 19: 3033-3055. doi: 10.1007/s1051 8-020-00924-x CNR-DT 212/2013, 2013. Instructions for the Reliability Assessment of Seismic Safety of Existing Buildings, National Research Council, Rome (in italian). D’Ayala, D., Meslem, A., 2013. Derivation of analytical fragility functions considering modelling uncertainties. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, New York, USA. da Porto, F., Donà, M., Rosti, A., Rota, M., Lagomarsino, S., Cattari, S., Borzi, B., et al., 2021. Comparative analysis of the fragility curves for Italian residential masonry and RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng. 19 (8), pp. 3209-3252. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01120-1 Del Gaudio, C., Di Ludovico, M., Polese, M., Manfredi, G., Prota, A., Ricci, P., Verderame, G.M., 2020. Seismic fragility for Italian RC buildings based on damage data of the last 50 years. Bull Earthq Eng; 18 (5), pp. 2023-2059. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-019-00762-6 Dolce, M., Masi, A., Marino, M., Vona, M., 2003. Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bull Earthq Eng; 1 (1), pp. 115-140. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024809511362 Fajfar, P., Gašperšič, P., 1996. The N2 Method for the Seismic Damage Analysis of RC Buildings, Earthq Eng Struct Dynam; Vol. 25, 31-46. Gubana, A., Noe’, S., Melotto, M., De Cillia, L., Barelli, S., Pascolat, S., Rinaldin, G., 2019. Seismic overall simplified strategies for vulnerability assessment of healthcare structures, XVIII ANIDIS Symposium, Seismic Engineering in Italy, Ascoli Piceno. Iervolino, I., Galasso, C., Cosenza, E., 2009. REXEL: computer aided record selection for code based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng; 8:339-362. ISTAT, 15° Censimento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni al 9 ottobre 2011, 2011. https://www.istat.it/it/files/2015/12/C18.pdf Italian Building Code NTC 2018, 2018. Ministerial Decree of 17 th January 2018, M.I.T., Rome (in Italian). Karapetrou, S., Manakou, M., Bindi, D., Petrovic, B., Pitilakis, K., 2016. ‘‘Time-building specific’’ seismic vulnerability assessment of a hospital RC building using field monitoring data. Eng Struct; 112:114–132, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.009 Kostinakis, K., Athanatopoulou, A., Morfidis, K., 2015. Correlation between ground motion intensity measures and seismic damage of 3D R/C buildings. Eng Struct; 82 151-167. DOI: 10.1016/j. engstruct2014.10.035 Kwon, O., Elnashai, A., 2006. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng Struct; 28:289-303. Lagomarsino, S., Cattari, S., 2015. Seismic Performance of Historical Masonry Structures Through Pushover and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses. In: Ansal A. (eds) Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Geotech Geol Earthq Eng; vol 39. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16964-4_11 Leite, J., Lourenco, P.B., Ingham, J.M., 2013. Statistical assessment of damage to churches affected by the 2010–2011 Canterbury (New Zealand) earthquake sequence. J Earthq Eng; 17(1):73–97. Masi, A., Digrisolo, A., Manfredi, V., 2015. Fragility curves of gravity-load designed RC buildings with regularity in plan. Earthq Struct; 9(1):1– 27. Masi, A., Lagomarsino, S., Dolce, M., Manfredi, V., Ottonelli, D., 2021. Towards the updated Italian seismic risk assessment: exposure and vulnerability modelling. Bull of Earthq Eng; 19 (8), pp. 3253-3286. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01065-5 Masi, A., Vona, M., Digrisolo, A., 2009. Derivation of Fragility Curves of some structural typologies representative of existing reinforced concrete buildings by non-linear dynamic analysis. XVII ANIDIS Symposium, Bologna (in Italian). Masi, A., 2003. Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthq Eng; 1(3):371–395. Mazelli, A., 2020. Non-linear evaluations of the seismic response of a reinforced concrete structure building (in Italian), Master Thesis, Supervisor: Gubana A., University of Udine. Nanos, N., Elenas, A., 2006. Seismic duration effects on the vulnerability of buildings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland. Pitilakis, K.D., Karapetrou, S.T., Fotopoulou, S.D., 2014. Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng; 12(4), pp. 1755-1776. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9575-8 Réveillère, A., Gehl, P., Seyedi, D., Modaressi, H., 2012. Development of seismic fragility curves for mainshock-damaged reinforced-concrete structures. In: Proceeding of the 15 WCEE, Lisboa. Rossetto, T., Elnashai, A., 2005. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct; 27 (3), pp. 397-409. DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.002 Takeda, T., Sozen, A., Nielsen, N.N., 1970. Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes, J Struct Eng Div; Vol. 96, No. 12, 2257 2273.

Vamvatsikos, D., Cornell, C.A., 2004. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Spectra; 20(2): 523–553. Vamvatsikos, D., Cornell, C.A., 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam; 31(3): 491–514.