PSI - Issue 44

Fabrizio Paolacci et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 44 (2023) 697–704 Fabrizio Paolacci et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2022) 000–000

704

8

closed form equation, is possible to evaluate the mean annual frequency of exceedance of a specific limit state. The method herein proposed has been applied to a case study to demonstrate its efficiency and reliability. Acknowledgements This work was carried out within the Research Project “MLAZIO” (Years 2022-2023) funded by Regione Lazio. Funding from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR), in the frame of the Department of Excellence Initiative 2018-2022, attributed to the Department of Engineering of Roma Tre University, is also acknowledged. References Adey, Klatter, Thomson, 2014. The IABMAS Bridge Management Committee Overview Of Existing Bridge Management Systems, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety – IABMAS. Alessandri, S., Giannini, R. and Paolacci, F. (2013), Aftershock risk assessment and the decision to open traffic on bridges. Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 42: 2255–2275. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2324. Abbiati G., Bursi O. S., Caperan P., Di Sarno L., Molina F.J, Paolacci F., Pegon P., (2015), "Hybrid simulations of a multi-span rc viaduct with plain bars and sliding bearings," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2580. Bianchini Ciampoli, L., Gagliardi, V., Ferrante, C., Calvi, A., D’Amico, F., Tosti, F. 2020. Displacement Monitoring in Airport Runways by Persistent Scatterers SAR Interferometry. Remote Sensing 12, 3564. Bortot, F., Zonta, D., Zandonini, R., 2006. A Bridge Management Strategy Based on Future Reliability and Semi-Markov Deterioration Models. ASRANet: Third International Colloquium 2006 (ASRANet 2006), Glasgow (UK), 10-12 July. Cood, E.F., 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM 13(6), 377-387. Costin, A., Adibfar, A., Hu, JH., Chen, S.S., 2018. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for transportation infrastructure – Literature review, Literature review, applications, challenges, and recommendations. Automation in Construction 94, 257-281. Cornell CA. Calculating Building Seismic Performance Reliability: A Basis for Multi-Level Design Norms. 11 WCEE. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 2122. Acapulco, Mexico, June 23-28, 1996. 1996Filiatrault A, Christopoulos C, Stearns C. Guidelines, specifications and seismic performance characterization of nonstructural building components and equipment. PEER Report 2002/05, University of California, Berkeley, CA 2001. D’Amico, F., Bertolini, L., Napolitano, A., Manalo, J. R.D., Gagliardi, V., Bianchini Ciampoli, L. Implementation of an interoperable BIM platform integrating ground-based and remote sensing information for network-level infrastructures monitoring. SPIE Remote Sensing 2022, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XIII (in press). D’Amico, F., Calvi, A., Schiattarella, E., Di Prete, M., Veraldi, V., 2020. BIM And GIS Data Integration: A Novel Approach Of Technical/Environmental Decision-Making Process In Transport Infrastructure Design. Transportation Research Procedia 45, 803-810. Paolacci F, Giannini R., Alessandri S., De Felice G., (2014), Seismic vulnerability assessment of a High Voltage Disconnect Switch, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 67, pp. 198-207, DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.014. Paolacci, F. and Giannini, R. (2012), An experimental and numerical investigation on the cyclic response of a portal frame pier belonging to an old reinforced concrete viaduct. Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 41: 1109–1127. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1175 De Risi R., Di Sarno L., Paolacci (2017) Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment of an Existing RC Bridge Designed for Gravity Loads Only, Engineering Structures, Volume 145, 15 August 2017, Pages 348-367, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.053 M. S. Günay, “An equivalent linearization procedure for seismic response prediction of mdof systems,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2008. Liu Y., Paolacci F., Lu D, (2017) Seismic fragility of a typical bridge using extrapolated experimental damage limit states, Earthquakes and Structures, Vol. 13, No. 6 (2017) 599-611, DOI:10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.599 Jalayer, Fatemeh, and C. Allin Cornell, 2003. A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats. RMS. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti – MIT: “Linee guida per la classificazione e gestione del rischio, la valutazione della sicurezza ed il monitoraggio dei ponti esistenti”. Allegate al parere del Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici n.88/2019, espresso in modalità “agile” a distanza dall’Assemblea Generale in data 17.04.2020. (in Italian). Nielson, B.G., and Des Roches, R., 2007. Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the centraland southeastern united states, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 615-633. Pellegrino, C., Pipinato, A., Modena, C., 2011. A simplified management procedure for bridge network maintenance. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 7(5), 341-351. Pinto P., Giannini R., Nuti C., Autorstrade SpA ‘Studio per la valutazione del rischio sismico della rete autostradale allo stato attuale, individuazione della necessita di intervento, individuazione delle misure di adeguamento delle opere d’arte’, 1996. Quinci, G., Gagliardi, V., Pallante, L., Manalo, J. R.D., Napolitano, A., Bertolini, L., Bianchini Ciampoli, L., Meriggi, P., D'Amico, F., Paolacci, F. A Novel Bridge Monitoring System Implementing Ground-Based, Structural and Remote Sensing Information into A GIS-Based Catalogue. SPIE Remote Sensing 2022, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XIII (in press).