PSI - Issue 44

Marco Gaetani d’Aragona et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 44 (2023) 1760–1767 Marco Gaetani d’Aragona et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2022) 000–000

1767

8

Acknowledgements This study was performed in the framework of PE 2022–2024 joint program DPC-Reluis–subprojects WP2: Inventory of structural type and existing buildings (CARTIS) and WP4: Risk maps and seismic damage scenarios (MARS-2). References ATC 58, 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings: volume 1 (methodology). California: Redwood City. Daniell J.E., Khazai B., Wenzel F., Vervaeck A., 2012. The worldwide economic impact of historic earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 15 world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisboa. Del Gaudio C., De Risi M.T., Ricci P., Verderame G.M., 2019. Empirical drift-fragility functions and loss estimation for infills in reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading. Bull Earthq Eng;17(3):1285–330. Del Vecchio C., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2020. Repair costs of reinforced concrete building components: from actual data analysis to calibrated consequence functions. Earthq Spectra; 36(1):353–77. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2017. Influence factors for the assessment of maximum lateral seismic deformations in Italian multistory RC buildings, proceedings of COMPDYN 2017 6th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece, 15–17 June 2017. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2018. Seismic vulnerability for RC infilled frames: simplified evaluation for as-built and retrofitted building typologies, Buildings, 8 (10), 137; doi:10.3390/buildings8100137 Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2019a. Simplified model calibration for dynamic response assessment of infilled RC buildings. In: Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. Greece: Crete; June 2019. p. 24–6. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Cosenza E., Prota A., 2019b. Simplified Assessment of Maximum Interstory Drift for RC Buildings with Irregular Infills Distribution Along the Height, Bull Earthquake Engineering; 17(2), 707-736. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0473-y. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2020. Stick-IT: a simplified model for rapid estimation of IDR and PFA for existing low-rise symmetric infilled RC building typologies. Eng Struct; 223:111182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. engstruct.2020.111182. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2021a. The use of Stick-IT model for the prediction of direct economic losses. In: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics;. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3429. Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2021b. Effect of Masonry Infill Constitutive Law on the Global Response of Infilled RC Buildings. Buildings; 11(2), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020057 Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2022a. Large scale loss assessment using stick-it model: A comparison with actual cost data, Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 160, 107363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107363 Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2022b. Stick model for as-built and retrofitted infilled RC frames, Engineering Structures (accepted). Gaetani d’Aragona M., Polese M., Prota A., 2022c. Stick model for response prediction of as-built and retrofitted infilled RC frames, submitted to XIX ANIDIS Conference, Seismic Engineering in Italy. Jamsek A., Dolsek M., 2020. Seismic analysis of older and contemporary reinforced concrete frames with the improved fish-bone model. Eng Struct;212:110514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110514. Khaloo A.R., Khosravi H., 2013. Modified fish-bone model: a simplified MDOF model for simulation of seismic responses of moment resisting frames. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng; 55:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.013. Lu X., Han B., Hori M., Xiong C., Xu Z., 2014. A coarse-grained parallel approach for seismic damage simulations of urban areas based on refined models and GPU/CPU cooperative computing. Adv Eng Software;70:90–103. Lu X., Tian Y., Wang G., Huang D., 2018. A numerical coupling scheme for nonlinear time history analysis of buildings on a regional scale considering site-city interaction effects. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam ;47(13):2708–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ eqe.v47.1310.1002/eqe.3108. Michelini A., Faenza L., Lanzano G., Lauciani V., Jozinovic D., Puglia R., Luzi L., 2020. The new ShakeMap in Italy: progress and advances in the last 10 yr. Seismol Res Lett;91(1):317–33. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190130 OpenSees, 2021. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation OpenSees framework-version 3.2.2. Pacific earthquake engineering research center. Berkeley: Univ. of California. Porter K.A., 2004. An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering; Polese M., Gaetani d’Aragona M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., 2018. Sustainable selective mitigation interventions towards effective earthquake risk reduction at the community scale. Sustainability; 10, 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082894. Soleimani R., Khosravi H., Hamidi H, 2019. Substitute frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames. Eng Struct 2019;185:68–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.127. Somerville P., 2002. Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges, in Proceedings of the third national seismic conference and workshop on bridges and highways 01/2002, 28 April–1 May, Portland, OR. Xiong C., Lu X., Guan H., Xu Z., 2016. A nonlinear computational model for regional seismic simulation of tall buildings. Bull Earthq Eng; 14(4):1047–69. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10518-016-9880-0 Yang T.Y., Moehle J., Stojadinovic B., Der Kiureghian A., 2009. Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: methodology and implementation. J Struct Eng;135 (10):1146–54.