PSI - Issue 43
Maroš Eckert et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 43 (2023) 318–323 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2022) 000 – 000
322
5
where the individual functional dependences f1 to f4 are defined by a polynomial dependence with the parameters given in Table 2.
Table 3. Constants of regression polynomial functions of material parameters for steel 100MnCrW4 F 1 ( ε ) F 2 ( ε ) F 3 ( ε )
F 4 ( ε )
D 0 = 0,02053 D 1 = -0,03577 D 2 = 0,08734 D 3 = -0,05492
E 0 = 3,1745 E 1 = 6,5989 E 2 = -46,3053 E 3 = 121,8473 E 4 = -139,2667 E 5 = 58,3584
F 0 = 326,1688 F 1 = 430,7578 F 2 = -2951,4895 F 3 = 7668,4699 F 4 = -8241,2172 F 5 = 3161,7272
G 0 = 27,0503 G 1 = 30,3846 G 2 = -213,4407 G 3 = 568,5267 G 4 = -617,4469 G 5 = 237,4956
- -
A comparison of experimental and predicted stress values for 100MnCrW4 material is shown in Fig. 4. The course of stresses was created based on equation (2), in which polynomial functions expressing the development of material parameters depending on the deformation were substituted. Two statistical parameters were used to assess the overall applicability of a given constitutive model. The first was the Pearson correlation coefficient R and the second was the average absolute percentage error of the forecast (hereinafter “ MAPE ” ), which is defined as: = 1 ∑| − | ∙ 100 =1 (3) where n s represents the number of all stress values. In this case, the Pearson correlation coefficient is R = 0.97885 and the value of MAPE = 17.28%, which can still be considered a good prediction (Fig. 4f). The largest deviations were achieved at the lowest form ing temperature of 800 °C, which means that the given temperature forms the limit temperature for the use of this model for the given steel.
1200 °C 1100 °C 1000 °C 900 °C 800 °C Model
1200 °C 1100 °C 1000 °C 900 °C 800 °C Model
240
1200 °C 1100 °C 1000 °C 900 °C 800 °C Model
Strain rate = 0.1 s -1
200
120
Strain rate = 0.01 s -1
Strain rate = 0.001 s -1
200
100
160
160
80
120
120
60
80
80
40
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
20 Stress (MPa)
40
40
0
0
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
True strain (-)
True strain (-)
True strain (-)
a)
b)
c)
350
1200 °C 1100 °C 1000 °C 900 °C 800 °C Model
1200 °C 1100 °C 1000 °C 900 °C 800 °C Model
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Stress (MPa)
100 150 200 250 300 350
R = 0,97885 MARE = 17,28 %
Strain rate = 10 s -1
Strain rate = 1 s -1
300
250
200
150
100
Stress (MPa)
Stress Best fitt
50
0 50
0 50
Predicted stress (MPa)
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
50
100 150 200 250 300 350 Measured stress (MPa)
True strain (-)
True strain (-)
d) f) Fig. 4. Comparison between measured and predicted flow stresses of 100MnCrW4 steel, a) strain rate 0.001 s -1 , b) strain rate 0.01 s -1 , c) strain rate 0.1 s -1 , d) strain rate 1 s -1 , e) strain rate 10 s -1 e)
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker