PSI - Issue 36
354 L. Poberezhna et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 36 (2022) 350–355 L. Poberezhna, V. Markhalevych, L. Poberezhny et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2021) 000 – 000
5
3. GIS model for thechnoecological risk estimation Based on the processing and analysis of available information on the location of oil and gas fields in oil and gas prospective areas near the demarcation zone on the territory of the Joint Forces Operation, GIS-model of distribution of potential risks was built (Fig. 4) and areas of potential damage were identified: • directly on the demarcation line or adjacent to it 11 oil and gas fields, 8 squares, and Yuzivska area; • in the occupied territory near the border with the occupier there is one oil and gas perspective area; • at a distance of up to 20-25 km from there are 4 more oil and gas fields and 9 areas in the demarcation zone. The visual image of probable areas of damage to the territory of oil and gas fields summarized and identified 6 types of artillery systems at maximum firing range: • approximately 70.0 km (approximately 300 mm MLRS Smertch); • approximately 37,5 km (203 mm 2С7 Peon); • approximately 35,0 km (220 mm MLRS Uragan); • approximately 24,0 km (152 mm 2А65 Msta - B or 2С19 Msta -S); • approximately 20,5 km (122 mm MLRS Grad); • approximately 15,3 km (122 mm D-30).
Figure 4. GIS-model of distribution of potential risks of emergencies due to the hit of ammunition of different types of weapons.
4. Сonclusions Tactical and technical characteristics of artillery and mortar systems used by the enemy were analyzed and a GIS model of technogenic and ecological monitoring with areas of increased risk of damage to oil and gas infrastructure in the area of the JFO and along the demarcation line was created. Based on the data of the operating organizations, the information of the responsible representatives of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the risk of damage to critical
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker