PSI - Issue 28
Mohamed Khodjet Kesba et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 28 (2020) 864–872 KHODJET KESBA Mohamed / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
866
3
Fig. 1. Transverse cracked off-axis [0/β] s composite laminate and geometric model
Strain- stress equations are giving in the following form : a) In the 0° layer:
0 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 0 0 0 0 0 yz xz yy xy xy xx yy xy xy xx
0
0
0
z z
xz
x
x
(1)
0 0 y
0
0 0 y
yz
0
zz
z
b) In the β° layer:
xz
x
x
(2)
y
yz
y
xz
yz
zz
z
Where S ij is the compliance matrix for off-axis composite laminate. We obtain the modified expression of the longitudinal Young’s modulus of the off-axis laminate due to transverse cracks: 0 12 0 90 0 0 0 12 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 s t s t s t s t R a a E t E t E E xy xy xy x x (3) The model developed by Berthelot (1997) is used. This latter is modified by introducing the stress perturbation function: (4) x a 11 0 90 12 21 0 0 yy
) cosh( ) cosh( a
) tanh( 2 a
( )
d x
R a
a
Where, is the shear-lag parameter:
0 0 t E E t t E t E (
)
(5)
2
G
0
0
The coefficient depends on used assumptions about the longitudinal displacement and shear stress distribution a) In the case of the assumption of a parabolic variation of longitudinal displacement in both 0° and 90° layers, the coefficient is done by : G G
t G G 3
(6)
The shear modulus G of the elementary cell:
(7)
G
G
xz
( )
' t f t f t
G G
1 3
xz
0
( )
xz
3 2
By replacing the function
in the (7), the shear modulus for parabolic
0 t t t 2 2 t t z f z z 2 t 0 0 2
2
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator