PSI - Issue 28
Dimitris Georgoulis et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 28 (2020) 2297–2303 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
2301
5
squares, is not significantly affected by corrosion for short exposure times up to 720 h where the remaining percentage of the conventional yield stress is approximately 99%. However, a significant decrease is noticed for long exposure times (> 1000 h) where the remaining percentage of the initial property value is almost 69 % after the highest exposure time of 4320 h in this case. AA2198-T8 exhibited slightly higher conventional yield stress degradation (up to 4 % from the initial property value) than AA2024-T3 for short exposure times. Nevertheless, in contrary to AA2024-T3 further corrosion exposure of AA2198-T8 seems to not affect the mechanical property since the remaining percentage remains constant even after heavily exposure specimens (black triangles in Fig. 3).
550
long exposure times
2198-T8
500
100 %
96 % 97.9 %
96 %
96.5 %
0 200 Conventional yield stress R p0.2% [MPa] short exposure times 250 300 350 400 450 99.6 % 99.4 % 100 %
2024-T3
98.9 %
92.7 %
68.5 %
Aluminum alloys (AA) t = 3.2 mm, L rolling direction Exposure to 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution x.x% remaining mechanical property
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Exposure time to 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution [hours]
Fig. 3: Conventional yield stress degradation of pre-corroded AA2024-T3 and AA2198-T8 specimens exposed for different times to 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution.
3.3.2. Tensile strength The values of the tensile strength R m were again calculated by taking into account the nominal cross-sections of the specimens and the results are summarized in Fig. 4. Comparative consideration of the plots for the two investigated aluminium alloys shows that AA2198-T8 degrades at slightly higher rates in comparison to AA2024-T3 regarding the short exposure times, e.g. 96 % remaining percentage of R m was noticed after 720 h of exposure while the respective value of AA2024-T3 was approximately 99 %. On the contrary, long exposure times have a profound effect on AA2024-T3 where the remaining percentage of the initial property decreased to 86 % while for AA2198-T8 the respective degradation was approximately 90 %.
600
long exposure times
550
100 %
2198-T8
96.8 %
95.8 %
350 Ultimate tensile strength R m [MPa] 400 450 500 99.2 % short exposure times
93.2 %
98.2 % 98.5 % 100 %
89.2 %
86 %
85.3 %
2024-T3
Aluminum alloys (AA) t = 3.2 mm, L rolling direction Exposure to 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution x.x% remaining mechanical property
0 300
0
1000 2000 3000 4000
Exposure time to 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution [hours]
Fig. 4: Ultimate tensile strength degradation of pre-corroded AA2024-T3 and AA2198-T8 specimens exposed for different times to 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution.
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator