PSI - Issue 28
Sabrina Vantadori et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 28 (2020) 1055–1061 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
1058
4
2
3 1
, 1
af
45
(3)
2
, 1
af
, 1 af and
, 1 af are the fatigue strength (at a given number 0 N of loading
where is expressed in degree, and
6 2(10) cycles) for fully reversed normal stress and that for fully reversed shear
cycles, generally assumed equal to
stress, respectively. At each time instant t , the stress vector w S related to the above critical plane orientation may be decomposed in two components: the normal stress vector N and the shear stress vector C , which are perpendicular to and lying on the critical plane, respectively (Fig. 2). Note that, during the period T , the direction of the normal stress vector is fixed with respect to time, whereas the shear stress vector describes a closed path on the critical plane.
Z
N
S w
w
Critical plane
X
P
u
C
Y
v
Fig. 2. Puvw local frame at point P (where u -axis is the intersection between the critical plane and the plane defined by w and Z -axis) and components of the stress vector w S acting on the critical plane. The Carpinteri et al. criterion proposes to transform the actual multiaxial stress state into an equivalent uniaxial one, whose amplitude is computed as follows:
2
, 1
af
2
2
(4)
N
C
, eq a
, eq a
a
, 1
af
with
, 1 m u N
N N
(5)
, eq a a af
where , eq a N is the equivalent normal stress amplitude, and u is the ultimate tensile strength of the material. The above-mentioned , eq a N is based on the well-known linear interaction between the normal stress amplitude a N and the normal stress mean value m N , described by the diagram of Gooodman. Such an equivalent amplitude is introduced in order to take into account that a tensile mean stress, superimposed on an alternating normal stress, strongly reduces the fatigue strength of metals. As has previously been discussed, a N and m N can readily be computed since the direction of N is fixed with
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator