PSI - Issue 28

321 11

Abdoullah Namdar / Procedia Structural Integrity 28 (2020) 311–322 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000

Settlement in X - direction

Fig. 7. a

20

15

10

5

0

-5

-10

Range of settlement

-15

-20

Settlement in X - direction

Fig. 7. b

Settlement in Y - direction

20

15

10

5

0

-5

-10

Range of settlement

-15

-20

Settlement in Y - direction

Fig. 7. The differential settlement range in X and Y directions.

4. Conclusion The pile modeled and it was subjected to seismic loading in the horizontal directions of the X and Y. The important peaks of the seismic loadings are extracted for assessment of the soil-pile interaction and settlement of the pile and it compared to the executing the huge number of the analytical process was made in using whole seismic loading in settlement analysis of the pile. The suggested analytical and statistical methods minimize the process of settlement of the pile evaluation and soil-pile interaction assessment. The results of the analytical process were showed the settlement mechanism in the X direction is not the same as the settlement mechanism in the Y direction. The differential settlement of the pile was occurred with two different mechanisms at X and Y directions and the pile subsoil interaction at X and Y directions exhibit differently. The nonlinear settlement at each direction of the X and