PSI - Issue 28
Alexey N. Fedorenko et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 28 (2020) 804–810 Fedorenko A., Fedulov B., Lomakin E. / Structural Integrity Procedia / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
807
4
impact diagrams. The most common experimental method of high strain rate properties characterization is split Hopkinson pressure bar (Koerber et al., 2010; Koerber et al., 2011). For example, using impact stress-strain diagram data at time t with constant strain rate v for compression in fiber direction, the following equation can be written:
X N
1 1 / ( ) X A B t X C C
( ) t
1
(7)
0
1 ( ) vt t E
1
,
C
0
1
11
X
0
where 1 11 ( ) t E represents Young modulus of damaged material in fiber placement direction at time t . In fact, on the right-hand side the quantity 0 1 11 ( ) vt t E is a current longitudinal for composite material stress value at time t of impact load, and vt is a current corresponding strain value. Therefore, mentioned quantities should agree to experimental ones. Equation (7) is considered as ordinary differential equation for 1 ( ) t with initial condition 1 (0) 1 . It can be solved numerically at first with trial constants, and a series of subsequent runs allows to find constants for a good agreement with experimental curves. 4. Numerical simulation The model presented in previous section was implemented to Abaqus finite-element software via user subroutines. Test problem of impact to a tubular specimen of typical geometry (Fig. 1) is considered for numerical simulation. The specimen is made of fiber-reinforced layered carbon-epoxy IM6G/3501-6 composite. Lay-up configuration includes two outer layers with reinforcement oriented in the circumferential direction, and the inner layers are oriented in the direction along the specimen. One edge of the specimen has a chamfer inclined to 30°, which plays the role of failure trigger. Another edge is freely set to supporting surface. Impactor weight is 200 kg and initial velocity is 4m/s. Material characteristics, including impact stress-strain diagrams, are taken from Hsiao and Daniel, 1999. Elastic static constants are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. IM6G/3501-6 elastic properties
E 22 (GPa)
E 33 (GPa)
G 13 (GPa)
G 23 (GPa)
G 12 (GPa)
E 11 (GPa)
12
13
23
171
13.5
13.5
0.31
0.31
0.31
7.5
7.5
7.5
Fig. 1. Specimen geometry and configuration
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator