PSI - Issue 27
Angga Kengkongan Ary et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 27 (2020) 69–76 Ary et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
76 8
5. Conclusions Based on the simulation results, the alternative structure of the urban vehicle chassis shows some behavior due to operational and internal factors. The intended internal factor is the type of frame material and its thickness, while the operational factor is the load held by the chassis. The effect of the material type used is an increase in the value of the safety factor and maximum stress and a decrease in the value of maximum displacement and also maximum strain as the ultimate strength value of the material applied to the chassis increases ( u SF min ; max ; y max ; max ). The influence of frame thickness is the tendency of maximum stress value, maximum displacement, and maximum strain to increase as well as the tendency to decrease the value of the safety factor along with the reduction in the thickness of the frame (t SF min ; max ; y max ; max ). The impact of loading applied to the urban vehicle chassis is an increase in the value of maximum stress, maximum displacement, and maximum strain, as well as a decrease in the value of the safety factor as the load increases (F SF min ; max ; y max ; max ). Acknowledgments Authors gratefully thank University Sebelas Maret, Indonesia for providing financial support through “ Peningkatan Kapasitas Laboratorium Penelitian UNS” (PKLP -UNS) 2020 grant with Contract No. 452/UN27.21/PN/2020. References Ary, A.K., Prabowo, A.R., Imaduddin, F., 2020. Structural assessment of alternative urban vehicle chassis subjected to loading and internal parameters using finite element analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 15, 1999-2022. Airale, A., Carello, M., Scattina, A., 2011. Carbon fiber monocoque for a hydrogen prototype for low consumption challenge. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 42(5), 386–392. Chugh, A., Ahuja, R., Ranjan, S., 2017. Shape Optimisation of Automobile Chassis. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology 6(2), 644–648. Ghalazy, N.M., 2014. Applications of Finite Element Stress Analysis of Heavy Truck Chassis: Survey and Recent Development. Journal of Mechanical Design and Vibration 2(3), 69–73. Guron, B.R, 2013. Finite Element Analysis of Cross Member Bracket of Truck Chassis. IOSR Journal of Engineering 3(3), 10–16. Hadimani, S., Sridhar, S., 2018. Modelling and Structural Analysis of Two Wheeler Chasis Frame. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research 6(1), 907–913. Hazimi, H., Ubaidillah, Setiyawan, A.E.P., Ramdhani, H.C., Saputra, M.Z., Imaduddin, F., 2018. Vertical bending strength and torsional rigidity analysis of formula student car chassis. AIP Conference Proccedings 1931, 030050. Hidayat, T., Nazaruddin, Syafri, 2017. Perancangan dan Analisis Statik Chassis Kendaraan Shell Eco Marathon Tipe Urban Concept. Jom FTEKNIK (4). Kamla, J., Parry, T., Dawson, A., 2019. Analysing truck harsh braking incidents to study roundabout accident risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention 122, 365-377. Kalghatgi, G., 2018. Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport?. Applied Energy 225, 965–974. Kaluza, A., Kleemann, S., Broch, F., Herrmann, C., Vietor, T., 2016. Analysing decision-making in automotive design towards life cycle engineering for hybrid lightweight components. Procedia CIRP 50, 825–830. Khan, M.A., 2013. Earthquake-Resistant structure, the first edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. Landay, K., Wood, D., Harms, P.D., Ferrell, B., Nambisan, S., 2020. Relationships between personality facets and accident involvement among truck drivers. Journal of Research in Personality 84, 103889. Mat, M.H., Ghani, A.R.A., 2012. Design and analysis of ‘eco’ car chassis. Procedia Engineering 41, 1756–1760. Matvienko, Y., 2013. Safety factors in structural integrity assessment of components with defects. International Journal of Structural Integrity 4(4), 457–476. McKeen, L.W., 2010. Introduction to Fatigue and Tribology of Plastics and Elastomers. Patil, H.B., 2013. Stress Analysis Automotive Chassis with Various Thicknesses. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 6(1), 44–49. Prabowo, A.R., Bae, D.M., Sohn, J.M., Zakki, A.F., Cao, B., Cho, J.H., 2017. Effects of the rebounding of a striking ship on structural crashworthiness during ship-ship collision. Thin-Walled Structures 115, 225-239. Prabowo, A.R., Bae, D.M., Sohn, J.M., Zakki, A.F., Cao, B., Wang, Q., 2018. Analysis of structural damage on the struck ship under side collision scenario. Alexandria Engineering Journal 57, 1761-1771. Raghuvanshi, A.C., Srivastav, T., Mishra, R.K., 2015. Design and Development of Foldable Kart Chassis. Material Today Procceding 2(4–5), 1707– 1713. Wang, J., Shi, C., Yang, N., Sun, H., Liu, Y., Song, B., 2018. Strength, stiffness, and panel peeling strength of carbon fiber-reinforced composite
sandwich structures with aluminum honeycomb cores for vehicle body. Composite Structures 184, 1189–1196. Yang, B., 2005. Stress Analysis in Two-Dimensional Problems. Stress, Strain, and Structural Dynamic II, 135–156.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software