PSI - Issue 27

Muhammad Yusvika et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 27 (2020) 109–116 Yusvika et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

116

8

Fig. 6. The most promising soft coating and application method (Aktas et al., 2020).

7. Conclusions The present paper presents a review of cavitation research on ship propellers. The investigation regarding cavitation inception under the hull effect on water inflow and open water conditions are discussed. Experimental observation and Numerical simulation are also be involved as the topic of discussion that applies a model scale compared to full scale. In particular, the cavitation mechanism that causes erosion in material damages is presented in this review paper with two types of investigation techniques that can be used to generate erosion profile on the propeller surface. Based on the erosion impact area and the intensity, predicted potential areas of erosion are shown. Both simulation and experimental research, these methods can qualitatively provide reliable results to predict erosion area due to the cavitation bubble bursts. References Aktas, B., Usta, O., Atlar, M., 2020. Systematic investigation of coating application methods and soft paint types to detect cavitation erosion on marine propellers. Applied Ocean Research 94, 101868. Brennen, C.E., 1995. Cavitation and Bubble Formation. The Oxford Engineering Science Series. Chihane, G., 2014. Advanced Experimental and Numerical Techniques for Cavitation Erosion Prediction. Chapter modeling of cavitation dynamics and interaction with material. Springer Science and Business Media. Feng, X., Lu, J., 2019. Effects of balanced skew and biased skew on the cavitation characteristics and pressure fluctuations of the marine propeller. Ocean Engineering 184, 184 – 192. Gaggero, S., Tani, G., Viviani, M., Conti, F., 2014. A study on the numerical prediction of propellers cavitating tip vortex. Ocean Engineering 92, 137 – 161. Ganesh, H., Mäkiharju, S.A., Ceccio, S.L., 2017. Bubbly shock propagation as a mechanism of shedding in separated cavitating flows. Journal of Hydrodynamics Ser. B 29, 907 – 916. Hammitt, F.G., 1963. Observations on cavitation damage in a flowing system. Transactions of the ASME. Series D, Journal of Basic Engineering 85 347 – 356 Helal, M.M., Ahmed, T.M., Banawan, A.A., Kotb, M.A., 2018. Numerical prediction of sheet cavitation on marine propellers using CFD simulation with transition-sensitive turbulence model. Alexandria Engineering Journal 57, 3805 – 3815. Knapp, R.T., 1955. Recent investigations of the mechanics of cavitation and cavitation damage. ASME Transaction 77, 1045 – 1054. Liu, Y., 2012. URANS computation of cavitating flows around skewed propellers. J ournal of Hydrodynamic 24, 339 – 346. Lush, P.A., 1983. Impact of a liquid mass on a perfectly plastic solid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 135, 373 – 387 Noack, J., Vogel, A., 1998. Single-shot spatially resolved characterization of laser-induced shock waves in water. Applied Optics 37, 4092. Paik, K.J., Park, H.G., Seo, J., 2013. RANS simulation of cavitation and hull pressure fluctuation for marine propeller operating behind-hull condition. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 5, 502 – 512. Peters, A., Lantermann, U., El Moctar, O., 2018. Numerical prediction of cavitation erosion on a ship propeller in model- and full-scale. Wear 408 – 409, 1 – 12. Schnerr, G.H., Schmidt, S., Sezal, I., Thalhamer, M., 2006. Shock and wave dynamics of compressible liquid flows with special emphasis on unsteady load on hydrofoils and cavitation in injection nozzles. Sixth International symposium on cavitation (CAV2006). Yusvika, M., Prabowo, A.R., Tjahjana, D.D.D.P., Sohn, J.M., 2020. Cavitation prediction of ship propeller based on temperature and fluid properties of water. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8, 465.